I've been thinking, is there a thinking model that can solve most of our problems? Just like the internal force in martial arts, no matter which martial arts school you practice, it is always beneficial to improve the internal force.
now that I've come up with it, I can't help sharing it with you. It doesn't matter whether you are lovelorn and can't get out, but you can't get promoted after hard work, or you can't do PPT or write articles at the end of the year. Is it complicated? Miscellaneous is right, which just shows how universal this model is.
this universal model is called "three-dimensional thinking method" (I haven't made up a more low-key and luxurious name with connotation, haha), and it is suitable for various scenes such as work, study, life, love, friendship and affection. Don't talk nonsense, just go to the picture above:
Don't you understand it? For example:
Suppose you shoot food videos, and your video playback volume is 11,111. What should you do to increase the video playback volume?
One-dimensional: Look at it and look at it, and think vertically
First, find out all the factors that affect the video quality by using the 『MECE principle:
Here we use the process method to divide the video production process into early stage, middle stage and late stage, so you get such a tree diagram:
Next, think in one dimension:
Did I step in the same pit as him?
"fancy": what am I not doing well enough, and should I improve? What did you do well and can you keep it up?
"fancy": What's better than me for the video with the highest broadcast volume (let's say 1 million) among food videos? Where can I start if I want to reach this level or surpass him?
After analyzing the map item by item, and then making a table, you can fully know where you want to improve.
Maybe the language is not humorous enough, or the theme is not attractive enough, or the video is not clear enough, and so on. Of course, this seemingly simple item can be written in several books. If you want to improve one of them, you need to study very systematically.
One dimension is not difficult, most people can think of it, but two dimensions, not many people can think of it.
two-dimensional: viewing the left and viewing the right, thinking horizontally
"viewing the left": can other types of videos be used for reference? Like music videos? Funny video? Special effects video?
"in view": what is the competitiveness of food videos among all types of videos? If I switch to other types of videos, what are the available resources?
"Viewing Right": Is there anything that other media types can learn from? Like words? Like comics? Or movies, TV shows? A little more to the right, sketch? Drama?
focusing on a small circle, thinking is easy to be limited. when you jump out of this small circle of food videos, you will find that there are more ideas and it is easier to make unique works.
In the book The Birth of Great Ideas, a concept called "adjacent possibility" was put forward.
For example, the inventor of the airplane was inspired by birds; The inventor of the baby incubator was inspired by the chicken incubator; The inventor of radar was inspired by bats. . . . . .
If you can think in two dimensions, you have surpassed most people. If you add the third dimension, you can reduce the dimension of most people.
Three-dimensional: Remember yesterday, catch up with tomorrow, and think dynamically
"Remember yesterday": Your food video has always been well received, bringing you a good income, because you made the video early, enjoyed a wave of dividends, and the food video has a wide audience. You should thank yourself for your early vision and remember this experience.
"Steady Today": Because your food video is not difficult to make, many people will follow it soon, and your fans will be slowly diverted. What do you have to do now to form your own technical barriers so that others can't imitate them.
"Chasing Tomorrow": After the short video bonus gradually disappears, do you want to update the iteration or transform and innovate?
it is not another functional machine company that defeated a functional machine company, but a smart machine company. When the times eliminate you, they never say hello to you in advance.
one dimension: dig deep into the problem vertically, and analyze the ins and outs of the problem comprehensively.
two-dimensional: thinking about the problem horizontally and jumping out of Lushan Mountain may lead to new ideas.
three-dimensional: in order to add a time axis to thinking and look at problems dynamically, does the scheme that was effective yesterday still apply to today? The cold wave is coming tomorrow. Are you still wearing short sleeves like today?
applicable to feelings
why did ta like you very much before, but now she doesn't like you?
I liked you before because you could provide one or more of sexual value, material value or emotional value.
One-dimensional thinking: Is your value getting lower?
two-dimensional thinking: is there someone with higher value than you around ta?
three-dimensional thinking: in the past, ta valued emotional value, but now ta values material value more?
When you have no money, you think that bags with tens of dollars are pretty good. When you have some money, you start to buy bags with hundreds of dollars. At this time, you think that bags with tens of dollars are cheap and ugly, and your previous eyes are really terrible. I really want to hide in the refrigerator with salted fish blindfolded. After making a lot of money, you start to buy bags with tens of thousands of dollars, and you no longer look down on bags with hundreds of dollars. No matter the material or design, you can't enter your eyes.
In fact, love is also like this. It's ruthless, isn't it? But if you look at love from a dynamic perspective, you will find that a person who changes his mind may actually switch bags with you, which is essentially the same.
so, for the sake of love, you also have to constantly iterate and update.
Suitable for learning
Why haven't you become very powerful after reading a lot of books?
one-dimensional thinking: because you didn't dig deep into the knowledge points vertically. For example, when you see the term "skinner box Experiment" in a book, you can not only understand what it means, but also look down at where the term can be applied, and then look up at who its inventor is, and whether this inventor has other famous experiments, and so on.
Two-dimensional thinking: You didn't horizontally expand the knowledge points. You didn't think about the similarities and differences between skinner box's experiment and Pavlov's dog. You didn't think that slot machines were the practical application of skinner box's experiment, and you didn't think that what else could be invented by skinner box.
Three-dimensional thinking: You don't have a dynamic view of where skinner box can be used in today's society and how to improve it and apply it to the future society.
suitable for work
why didn't your career last long?
It's enough to think in the third dimension. Suppose you open braised chicken rice, you only know that the braised chicken sold well yesterday, but you didn't see that today, the braised shrimp and abalone are all out, and the competitiveness of braised chicken has become less, not to mention that tomorrow, the city planning will be transformed here, and your store will not be able to open immediately.
other scenes
what should I do if the point of view of the article is not in-depth?
suppose the Japanese nuclear waste water enters the sea, what is the harm? You can think deeply about the harm to the world, the country and people's livelihood. Horizontal comparative analysis of related nuclear leakage events; Considering the present, past and future hazards dynamically, such an in-depth and good article is completed.
what if the event planner can't do it? Three-dimensional thinking. What should I do if I summarize PPT? Three-dimensional thinking. What if I can't get promoted? Three-dimensional thinking. . . . . .
The dimensional thinking model can be varied and applicable to various scenarios, some scenarios only need one dimension, others need two dimensions and three dimensions, and can be split and merged. Now that I've given you the cheats, you should learn to draw inferences!