Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Food world - What debaters are there in "Qi Yuan Shuo" who combine face value and talent?
What debaters are there in "Qi Yuan Shuo" who combine face value and talent?

Since it became popular, The Tale of Qipa has not only won the popularity of Mix, Ma Weiwei and Fan Tiantian, but also my favorite baby Rujing. However, I can't blindly covet such a crystal baby's heart for food, and I have to uncover the real value war of "Qipa Shuo". The first is Fan Ye, who fell in love with the second season of "The Story of Qipa". Although the debate was not good, the face value was the highest since the beginning of "The Story of Qipa". Seducing the opponent's debater in the debate is his best thing. Followed by Jiang Sida, a Japanese-style teenager with a unique style, and high flyers of Communication University of China, a debater. I like Jiang Sida's styling, hairstyle and even accessories.

and Qiu Chen. She only attributes language to language, and views to opinions. It doesn't seem to give her own story in it, and she doesn't emphasize the touching side of emotion. It seems that she doesn't understand the amorous feelings, but it is the most touching look in every word she says. She let me know some ways to express my thoughts. Rational language is like a thousand waves, giving you firmness, or shaking your firmness. The collision of ideas in brain communication may not have a unique answer, so it is not important to think about the answer, but it is important to think about the logic that leads to this answer. Moreover, rational words can actually be that the water is too quiet and traceless. You have a little inner softness, so let it flow and touch it quietly. It is not so obvious, but you will understand it a little and you will not understand it a little. The feeling of understanding is the value of language, and those who don't understand are the value of thinking. If the five seasons are integrated, my two favorite debaters are about Huang Zhizhong and Ming Chen, and personally, they are a bit of coin. Most debaters are based on the debate and explain it from a perspective, and these two first establish a world and then incorporate the debate into a part of that world. When you accept their views, you actually accept a world.

That's what Teacher Ma Dong described:? Once you believe his (Ming Chen's) stuff, you can't refute it. ? It's just that Mr. Ming Chen appeals more to the bright side of human nature. The world he built is: the sun shines, the seasons are like spring, and everyone is rational, intelligent and measured. Then he tells you that this beautiful world is not so far away, everyone can get it by taking a step forward, and you deserve it.