While many netizens feel that this is not a matter, not worth discussing, but after saying that we must also add a comment on the tofu brain. Tofu brain sweet and salty fight, now fight on the microblogging, as the netizen "king chief" said, which reflects the microblogging "think of the people think". The topic is "micro", but exactly what you want. The other netizens pointed out that the reason why the salty and sweet tofu brain can be discussed, it is the result of population mobility, the integration of people from all over the world, which naturally brings the different styles of food.

Cultural scholar Chen Bin believes that the sweet and salty tofu brain debate is "the microbloggers' interest in discussing simple and beautiful things. Bean curd is too close to everyone's life, it's cheap, it's often available, especially when you're a kid, and it carries a lot of memories for many people. People are so keen to discuss the difference between sweet and salty tofu brain is also a relentless pursuit and discussion of culinary experience. This debate is a difference in thinking patterns. The mindset should be more open and inclusive. If you like sweet, you should not dictate to the salty; if you like savory, you should understand the sweet. Don't assume that there are no preferences in the world other than your own tastes."

In fact, the tofu brain controversy has become, to some extent, a dissident buffer zone between those who disagree on the Internet. Whenever netizens' opinions diverge, and the back-and-forth becomes more heated, looming as an argument or even a fight, someone with a sense of humor will often post something like, "Tofu brain must be sweet! Salty parties are heretics!" The fact that they are not related to the subject matter is a great reminder that both sides should be more calm and peaceful in exchanging views and understanding each other.