The original text is: "There is fat meat in the barn, fat horses in the stables, hungry people, and hungry people in the wild, which leads to beasts and cannibalism. Animals eat each other, and people hate it; For the people's parents and administration, it is inevitable to lead animals and eat people. The evil is that it is also for the people's parents. Zhong Ni said:' the initiator, there will be no consequences!' It is also used for it to be like a person. How did it make the people die of hunger? "
General idea of the full text: (People's parents and officials) There are fat meat in the kitchen, fat horses in the stables, sallow and emaciated civilians, and people starving on the road, which is driving wild animals to eat (occupy) people's living space. Beasts eat each other, but people are disgusted; As a parent, if we don't guard against the phenomenon that wild animals eat people (the same as above) when governing the people, can we say that he is disliked by the people only because he pretends to be the parents of the people, which makes the people feel rebellious? Confucius said: was it because there were no living people who could be buried with figurines that the first person came up with them? That's because he thinks of the living and replaces the burial with something like a person. If (above) parents are as concerned about the people as the "initiator" is about the living, how can they starve the people to death?