Fish, what I want; Bear's paw is what I want You can't have your cake and eat it (jiān), and you can't have your cake and eat it. Life is what I want; Righteousness is also what I want. You can't have it both ways (jiān), and those who give up their lives for justice are also. Life is what I want, and I want it more than the living, so I don't want it for (wéi) or (gǒu); I hate (us) death, and I hate (us) more than death, so I suffer what I don't want (b √). What people want is nothing more than life. Why not use people who can live? If people are more evil than the dead, why not (wéi) those who can be cured (bü)? If you are right, you will be born without need, and if you are right, you will be free from (b) suffering without need (wéi). Therefore, you want more than the living, and what you do is worse than the dead. But with disdain to drink and eat, hungry pedestrians are unwilling to accept it; Kick others' food with their feet, and beggars will not accept it.
If you eat (dān) and eat (shí), you will live if you get a bean soup (gēng), and you will die if you get one. Call it, and the people in the street will be blessed; It is shameful to beg for help.
Is it for the splendor of the house, the service of my wives and the poor people who know how to appreciate me? For (wèi) the beauty of the palace, the battle of wives and concubines (qiè), those who know the poor get (dé) me (yú)? My hometown (xiàng) died for (wéi), and now there are people in the palace (Wé i); Hometown is not subject to physical death, and now it is regarded as (wé i) by wives and concubines; Hometown is not subject to physical death, and now it is (wèi) knowing the poor (fá) knowing (dé) knowing who (wé i); Is it ok or not? This is called (wèi) losing its true heart.
translate
Fish is what I want; Bear's paw is what I want, too You can't have these two things at the same time. I will give up fish and choose bear's paw. Life is what I want; Morality is also what I want. I can't have these two things at the same time. I will give up my life and choose morality. Life is what I want, but there are things I want more than life, so I don't do anything to drag out an ignoble existence. I hate death, but there are things more disgusting than death, so there are disasters that I can't avoid. If people want nothing but life, then what can't be done by all methods that can save lives? If nothing is more hateful than death, what can't be done by any means that can avoid disaster? According to this law, you can survive without it, and according to this law, you can avoid disaster without it. It is because there is something more desirable than life (that is righteousness) and something more disgusting than death (that is injustice). Not only sages have this idea, but everyone has this idea. It's just that sages can keep morality.
A bowl of rice, a bowl of soup, you get it, you live, you lose it, you die. If (if) you give people (food) impolitely, even the hungry people passing by will not accept it; Kick it to others, even beggars refuse to accept it because of contempt. If I accept a high salary without knowing whether it is moral or not, what good will it do me! Is it for the beauty of the palace, for the service of wives, or for the poor people I know? In the past, I would rather die than accept (charity) for (morality), but now I accept it for the beauty of the palace; In the past, I would rather die than accept (charity) for (morality), but now I accept it for wives and concubines; In the past, I would rather die than accept (charity) for (morality), but now I accept it for the poor people I know who appreciate themselves. Can't this behavior stop? If you don't stop, this is what you call losing people's original heart, which is also the heart of shame and evil.