Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Take-out food franchise - Guangdong Shengli Hotel Profile Guangzhou Shengli Hotel Profile
Guangdong Shengli Hotel Profile Guangzhou Shengli Hotel Profile
1. Introduction of Guangzhou Shengli Hotel

Are you sure it's not Huangsha?

Located at the junction of Datong Road and 623 Road in Liwan District, Huangsha, near Shamian Island and Guangzhou South Railway Station; Huangsha Station is adjacent to Shamian with unique European style, and there are famous White Swan Hotel, Shengli Hotel, Huangsha Aquatic Products Market and Qingping Medicinal Materials Wholesale Market nearby.

2. Introduction of Guangzhou Shengli Hotel

Youpai Hotel Taiyuan Shengli Bridge East, Hanting Express Hotel Shengli Bridge East, Shell Hotel Taoyuan North Road Shengli Bridge East, Home Inn Taiyuan Xinjian North Street, Jinjiang Star Taiyuan Longtan Park, 7 Days Hotel Chain Taiyuan North Street wanda plaza, Shengli Street Coconut Crystal Hotel, Ginza Jiayi Taiyuan wanda plaza Shengli Street, Greentree Inn Shell Hotel Taiyuan Hanxiguan Street Wanda Mansion Shell Hotel, Taikuang Hotel, Genting International Hotel, Greentree Inn Taixing Huajie Store, Taiyuan Ruihe; F Wanda Wenhua Hotel, Taiyuan Wanda Wenhua Hotel, Haiyou Hotel Xinghua Street Store, Yuejia Hotel, iu Hotel Jiefang Road North Street Wanda Store, Hanting Hotel Taiyuan Jiefang Road wanda plaza Store, 7 Days Hotel Chain Taiyuan Guo Mao Store, Binhe Hotel and other hotels.

3. Food near Guangzhou Victory Hotel

1. Guangzhou baiyun hotel

Lowest price: 448.

Hotel grade: 4-star area: 360-degree panoramic display near Huanshi East Road.

The four-star hotel managed by the Best Western Group has convenient transportation.

The hotel is located in the bustling area of Huanshi East Road, near the railway station. It opened on 1976 and was partially renovated in 2003. It has a 32-story building with 704 rooms.

2. Guangzhou Liu Hua Hotel

Lowest price: 428.

Hotel Grade: Four-star area: 360-degree panoramic display of railway station and Liu Hua Road Trade Hall.

Close to Liu Hua Trade Club/Newly renovated hotel.

Located at the intersection of Huanshi West Road and Renmin North Road, the hotel was renovated in 2005. This building is eight stories high and has more than 500 rooms.

3. Huaxia Hotel Guangzhou

Lowest price: 425.

Hotel grade: 4-star area: 360-degree panoramic display of Haizhu Square on Beijing Road.

A bustling area near Haizhu Square.

The hotel is located in the bustling business district of Haizhu Square, close to the city center. It opened in June 1994 and was partially renovated in 2002. The building is 39 stories high and has 566 rooms.

4. Guangdong Shengli Hotel (Guangzhou)

Lowest price: 320.

Hotel grade: 4-star area: 360-degree panoramic display of Shamian and Shangxiajiu Pedestrian Street.

Shamian's only four-star hotel on the list

The hotel is located in Shamian Island, near Shangxiajiu Road Pedestrian Street. It opened on 1895 and was partially renovated in 2003. This is a 9-story building with 330 rooms.

5. Guangdong Building (Guangzhou)

Lowest price: 380 pounds

Hotel grade: 4-star area: 360-degree panoramic display of Haizhu Square on Beijing Road.

It is close to Yuexiu Park, which is very famous.

The hotel is adjacent to the people, and it only takes 10 minutes to walk to the business district of Beijing Road. It opened in March 1988, and some rooms were renovated in September 2005. The building is 2 1 floor high and has 500 rooms.

6. Rundu Hotel in Guangzhou

Lowest price: 300 pounds

Hotel grade: 4-star area: 360-degree panoramic display of Tianhe City and East Railway Station.

Hotels near Pazhou Trade Hall and Huacheng Convention and Exhibition Center

The hotel opened in 2004, adjacent to the beautiful Tianhe Park, with modern architectural style.

4. Guangdong Shengli Hotel Co., Ltd.

Introduction: Guangdong Shengli Hotel is located in Shamian Island, a famous foreign affairs tourist area and historical relics protection area in Guangzhou. The hotel is surrounded by green trees all year round and has an elegant environment. It has a paradise. Shengli Hotel has a long history. Its predecessor was the Victoria Hotel built by the British in the early 20th century. It is a star-rated hotel in Guangzhou that retains the classical architectural style of western Europe. Its interior decoration is gorgeous and full of rich artistic atmosphere.

The hotel has Chinese, Japanese and French luxury suites, standard suites, double rooms and single rooms. The interior layout is elegant and comfortable, and modern facilities are complete. Hotel business center, large and small meeting rooms, multi-functional meeting rooms and other supporting facilities are readily available, suitable for large-scale group meetings, negotiations, business exhibitions.

Legal representative: Huang Shuqiang, founded in July 1989, with registered capital of14.28 million yuan and industrial and commercial registration number of 440000057424. Enterprise type: company owned by the whole people. Address: 53 and 55 Shamian North Street and 54 and 56 Shamian Street, Liwan District.

Huangsha Station is located at the junction of Datong Road and 623 Road in Liwan District, near Shamian Island and Old Guangzhou South Station. Huangsha Station is adjacent to the sand surface with unique European style. There are famous White Swan Hotel, Shengli Hotel, Huangsha Aquatic Products Market and Qingping Medicinal Materials Wholesale Market nearby. There are 6 entrances and exits, B is located in Datong Road, D and E are located in 623 Road, and C and F are located in Duhui Square in Xicheng.

5. Address of Guangzhou Shengli Hotel

1. Dongfeng East Road Branch. Yuexiu district. Floor 1, Tianyu Building, No.753 Dongfeng East Road

Liwan Sub-branch in Liwan District, the first floor of Yehe Plaza, No.488 Kang Wang Middle Road, Shamian Sub-branch, and the first floor of Guangdong Shengli Hotel Complex Building, No.71Shamian North Street. Jiangnan west branch, Haizhu district. Northeast corner of 4th floor, No.60 and No.66 Jiangnan West Road. Floor 2 and 3 1 F, No.80, Jiangnan Avenue Middle Road, Qianjin Sub-branch, Haizhu District

: Zhang Ziqiang was shot at 195 1.

The story of the world thief Zhang Ziqiang;

A group of foreigners fled to Shenzhen, Guangdong, to track down the kidnappers who kidnapped the rich and extorted money. The ransom was as high as 6,543,802,790 yuan. On July 28th, the American Intermediate People's Court in Shenzhen sentenced Li Qiang gang, who ranked first in the "death penalty", to fixed-term imprisonment of 15 years and fined 500,000 yuan. Other gang members were also sentenced to 6 to 14 years in prison. Fixed-term imprisonment and a fine of not less than 30,000 yuan but not more than 400,000 yuan.

This gang has created many shocking cases of kidnapping and extortion in Shenzhen. On the evening of February 7th, the gang kidnapped Chen Mou, a Chinese American, in Futian District of Shenzhen, and extorted $6 million from his family.

On June 65438+1October 2 1 day, 2002, Li Qiang instructed his gang members to kidnap Shan with guns and demanded a ransom of HK$130,000. During the Spring Festival in 2003, they planned a kidnapping order again, and the ransom was 65,438 Hong Kong dollars+800,000 yuan. Under the orders of Shenzhen police, all members of this mega-kidnapping gang headed by Li Qiang were finally destroyed.

Li Qiang, a native of Jilin, aged 3 1, is a member of a kidnapping gang. First place, served as a special police officer in Changchun Armed Police Force; The second kidnapper, liuyong, once worked as a scout, participated in many Sanda competitions and won the championship.

The Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court of the United States publicly made a first-instance judgment on Zhang Ziqiang's case and sentenced five defendants, including Zhang Ziqiang, to death.

Zhang Ziqiang, known as the richest man in the United States, has been bullying in Hong Kong and the mainland for several years, kidnapping, robbing, smuggling weapons and transporting explosives, which has repeatedly made a group of luxury figures in Hong Kong avoid it. 1On October 26th, the police in Beijing, Guangzhou and Hong Kong held a secret meeting and arrested Zhang Ziqiang and his associates in Shanwei. On August 26th, Hong Kong police raided the residence in Hong Kong and the residence of their relatives, arrested Zhang's 15 relatives suspected of money laundering, and frozen goods worth HK$ 654.38+600 million. On October 6th, 2002, five principal criminals, including Zhang Ziqiang, were sentenced to death. On the day of the trial of Zhang Ziqiang Group, the US military police court around the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court was fully armed and armed with live ammunition. At the same time, the Secretary for Security of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Mrs Regina Ip, said that Zhang Ziqiang's crackdown on American criminal gangs by the mainland judiciary did not harm Hong Kong, and the public should not have any doubts about Hong Kong. Judicial independence. This independence is manifested in the confiscation of Zhang Ziqiang's 660 billion yuan of black money; In Hong Kong, on1October 3, the Hong Kong High Court revoked the order of the Ministry of Justice to freeze the property of 13 relatives of Zhang Ziqiang Group members, arguing that the evidence at this stage is insufficient to freeze the property exceeding160 billion Hong Kong dollars, including property houses, jewels, yachts, antiques, cash and bank deposits. Although mainland media rarely report Zhang Ziqiang's triad case, it will become more and more popular.

In 1998, Zhang Ziqiang's name was unknown.

Among the major kidnapping and extortion cases known so far, Zhang Ziqiang's extortion amount is undoubtedly the highest. Several well-known wealthy businessmen in Hong Kong were blackmailed by him, and the amount of blackmail was reported to Kazakhstan.

As Zhang Ziqiang is a Hong Kong citizen, his crimes were committed in the Mainland and Hong Kong respectively. There are different opinions on whether Zhang Ziqiang should be tried by mainland judicial organs. However, both the judicial departments in Hong Kong and the Mainland believe that many of Zhang Ziqiang's criminal activities took place in the Mainland, and the judicial departments in the Mainland have laws to follow in his trial.

Zhang Ziqiang was praised by Hong Kong people after his arrest. However, there is no death penalty in Hong Kong. According to American criminal law, Zhang Ziqiang was executed. Mainland judicial organs can help Hong Kong citizens, but they have also done great harm to the people of China! (People's Network)

/today_t.asp? id=2262

There are pictures

Zhang Ziqiang and others illegally buy, sell and transport explosives, rob, kidnap and smuggle weapons and ammunition,

Appeal case of transporting guns and ammunition and possession of guns and ammunition

-

Appellant (defendant in the original trial): Zhang Ziqiang, male, 43 years old, from Yulin City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, living in Hong Kong, with the Hong Kong identity card number of d 123744(7). Arrested on July 22nd, 1998.

Appellant (defendant in the original trial): Chen Zhihao, male, 36 years old, from Haifeng County, Guangdong Province, living in Hong Kong, with the Hong Kong identity card number of h 1035 12(8). Arrested on July 22nd, 1998.

Appellant (defendant in the original trial): Ma, male, aged 33, from Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, living in laohekou city City, Hubei Province. 1997 1 1 month was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment 1 1 year, deprived of political rights for 3 years, and served his sentence in Shiping Prison, Guangdong Province. On June 23rd, 1998 was taken back to Guangzhou for trial.

Appellant (defendant in the original trial): Hui Liang, male, 32 years old, from laohekou city, Hubei Province, living in laohekou city. Arrested on July 22nd, 1998.

Appellant (defendant in the original trial): Qian Hanshou, male, 42 years old, from Haifeng County, Guangdong Province. Living in Hong Kong, Hong Kong ID number: d 598063(2). Arrested on July 22nd, 1998.

1998 10.30 Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court of Guangdong Province v. Ma, Qian Hanshou, Zhu Yucheng, Cai Zhijie, Yu, Liu Dingxun, Huang Huasheng, Ke Xianting, Hu, Ye Xinyu, Qian Hanye, Luo Zhiping, Gan Yongqiang, Deng Lixian, Zhang Huanqun, Deng Lixian. Crime of illegally buying and selling guns and ammunition, crime of possessing guns and ammunition, and crime of harboring (the space of this journal is limited, and the judgments of 3 1 defendant such as Li Yun are omitted). Among them, the defendant Zhang Ziqiang committed the crime of illegally buying and selling explosives, was sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life; He was sentenced to life imprisonment for kidnapping, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of 662 million yuan; For the crime of smuggling weapons and ammunition, he was sentenced to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 6,543,800+. Decided to execute the death penalty, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 662,654.38+0 billion. Sentenced the defendant Chen Zhihao to death for robbery, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of 540,000 yuan; Sentenced to death for smuggling weapons and ammunition, suspended for two years, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB100000 yuan; For the crime of kidnapping, he was sentenced to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 295 million; Sentenced to eight years in prison for illegally transporting explosives; Sentenced to six years in prison for illegally buying and selling guns and ammunition; He was sentenced to two years in prison for possession of ammunition. Decided to execute the death penalty, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 295.64 million. Sentenced the defendant Ma to death for robbery, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 6,543,800 yuan; For the crime of smuggling weapons and ammunition, he was sentenced to 15 years in prison, deprived of political rights for five years, and confiscated property of RMB 50,000; Sentenced to 12 years in prison and deprived of political rights for four years for the crime of illegally buying and selling guns and ammunition; The original judgment sentenced him to nine years, five months and five days in prison for theft and deprived him of political rights for three years. Decided to execute the death penalty, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 654.38+RMB 5,000. Sentenced the defendant Hui Liang to death for robbery, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 6,543,800 yuan; For the crime of kidnapping, he was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 13 years, deprived of political rights for 4 years, and confiscated property of RMB 3.6 million; He was sentenced to 12 years. For the crime of smuggling weapons and ammunition, he was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment, deprived of political rights for 4 years, and confiscated property of RMB 50,000. Decided to execute the death penalty, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated property of RMB 3.75 million. The defendant Qian Hanshou was sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life for the crime of illegally buying and selling explosives.

After the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, the defendants Ma and Qian Hanshou appealed.

Appellant Zhang Ziqiang and his defender said: The crime place of this case is in Hong Kong, and the object of infringement is the personal rights and property rights of Hong Kong residents, which should be under the jurisdiction of the Hong Kong courts, but the jurisdiction of the court of first instance is improper; Zhang Ziqiang only contacted Qian Hanshou when buying explosives, but should not be responsible for the whole case; The sentencing of the crime of illegally buying and selling explosives in the original judgment was biased; The evidence of the crime of kidnapping determined in the original judgment is insufficient, so the victim's statement, the defendant's confession and relevant physical evidence shall be applied for the second trial; Smuggling guns and ammunition is only a preparatory act for the crime of kidnapping and should not be convicted separately; Zhang Ziqiang reported some criminal clues, such as crossing the border, robbing Hong Kong gold shops and drug trafficking. He should be given a lighter punishment because of his meritorious service. The appellant and his defenders believe that the original judgment found Chen.

Appellant Ma and his defenders believe that the defendant Ma did not poke the eyes of the American people, did not use sealant tape, and did not intentionally cause the death of the victim in the process of robbing Li; He was not the principal in the two robberies he participated in and asked for a lighter punishment in the second instance.

Appellant Hui Liang and his defenders believe that the original judgment found that Hui Liang threatened and beat the victim in the case of robbing Li Xi, and there was no direct evidence of the victim's death; Hui Liang is an accessory to this case. After being arrested, he confessed and confessed the criminal facts of his accomplices. He should have turned himself in and made meritorious deeds, and asked for a lighter punishment in the second instance.

Appellant Qian Hanshou and his defenders said: Qian Hanshou did not donate money or illegally buy or sell explosives, but was instructed by others to transport explosives, and the circumstances were minor, so he was an accessory to the crime of transporting explosives; Being able to plead guilty and expose many criminal facts of accomplices after being arrested should be regarded as meritorious service; The sentence in the original trial was too heavy, and the second trial demanded a lighter punishment.

The Guangdong Higher People's Court found through trial that in June, 5438+0997 10, the appellant Zhang Ziqiang proposed to the appellant Qian Hanshou to buy explosives, and assigned Liu Dingxun to contact Qian Hanshou for specific matters. He also paid 65,438 Hong Kong dollars+500,000 yuan to Qian Hanshou through Liu Dingxun to buy explosives. In June165438+1October of the same year, Qian Hanshou returned to Shanwei, Guangdong Province and illegally purchased 8 18.483 kilograms of explosives, 2,000 detonators and 750 meters of fuses. Packed in 40 foam boxes disguised as seafood,1998 65438+1October 7, he instructed others to transport it to Hong Kong and give it to Liu Dingxun. The next morning, Zhang Ziqiang, Liu Dingxun and others carried explosives into No.95, Xiangdawo Village, Liu Shui. Turn to No.94, Macaolong Village at noon. On June 17, explosives were confiscated. From the end of 1994 to the beginning of 1995, the appellant Chen Zhihao contacted Ye Jihuan and participated in the plot of Cai Zhijie and others to hijack Li Xi, the manager of the Shenzhen office of Tianjin Materials Comprehensive Trade Center, in order to obtain a batch of steel bills of lading and extract steel in Shenzhen. 10o199565438+10 14 in the evening, the appellant was instructed to drive a jeep to meet him in Shenzhen, and he would be hijacked near Shenzhen South International Hotel in Guangzhou. On the way, driving, threatening and beating the victim. Liang Huika's victim, Ma, was handcuffed to her neck and hands, while sealing the victim's American population and eyes with sealing tape. Hou Ma and Liang covered the victims with quilts and clothes. After he died, he looked for the key to his office. The horse drove the car to the suburbs and dumped the body, and gave the key to Yu and others. On June 16, Cai Zhijie and others took 277.39 tons of 8 mm diameter Panyuan steel and sold it with the bill of lading found from the victim. 199 1 At the beginning of the year, the appellants Ma, Zhu Yucheng, Huang Huasheng, Lin Tie and others conspired to rob a Hong Kong gold shop in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Ma He went to Pingyuan Street in Yanshan County and bought two AK47 automatic rifles, two May 4th pistols and three grenades. Chen Zhihao went to Hengyang City, Hunan Province to buy 350 bullets, 3 grenades and some pistol accessories. In June of the same year, Ma, Zhu Yucheng and Lin Tie were arranged to smuggle two AK47 automatic rifles, six pistols, three grenades, 350 rounds of bullets and pistol accessories from Shenzhen to Hong Kong to meet Huang Huasheng who arrived in Hong Kong earlier. On the afternoon of the 9th of the same month, seven people, including Ma, carried masks, screwdrivers, cloth bags, gloves and other tools to drive the light truck of the robbery victim Yu to Wuhua Street. Ma guarded the street with a gun, while others rushed into five jewelry stores, including Chow Tai Fook and Dongsheng, and threatened to take a batch of gold wares at gunpoint. When the Hong Kong police rounded up, they shot at the horse, and seven people fled the scene together by car. On the way, another victim had an S-car. After being robbed, he changed to another car and continued to escape. After the crime, the stolen goods were sold, and Ma got 420,000 Hong Kong dollars and 6,543,800 yuan. At the beginning of 1992, the appellant Chen Zhihao and Zhu Yucheng,,, Lin Tie and others robbed Hong Kong again in Guangshen. On the afternoon of March 10 of the same year, after someone robbed the victim Chen's taxi and Zhong's light truck in Hong Kong, Zhu Yucheng drove, while others took guns, stockings, screwdrivers, cloth bags, gloves and other crime tools to Tai Po Road in Hong Kong. Ye Jihuan is guarding the street with a gun, and Zhu Yucheng is waiting to see him in the car. Others rushed into two jewelry stores in Zhou Shengsheng and Xie Ruilin and threatened them at gunpoint. When the Hong Kong police rounded up, the two fled the scene together by car. After committing the crime, Chen Zhihao received money of HK$ 6.5438+RMB 200,000 from Ye Jihuan. From the end of 1995 to the beginning of 1996, the appellants Zhang Ziqiang, Chen Zhihao, Ke Xianting, Zhu Yucheng, Liu Yun, Ye Jihuan and Guo Zhihua conspired to kidnap and blackmail Hong Kong residents.

Zhang Ziqiang invested HK$ 6.5438+0.4 million to buy guns, ammunition, vehicles and other crime tools, and rented a house to hold hostages; Chen Zhihao and Zhu Yucheng are responsible for buying vehicles, fake license plates and walkie-talkies, and Zhu Yucheng is also responsible for renting farmhouses where hostages are held; Ke Xianting is responsible for observing Li's whereabouts. Therefore, Ye Jihuan purchased two AK47 automatic rifles, one submachine gun, five pistols, nine packs of explosives (weighing 1.887 kg) and a batch of bullets from the mainland. 1On May 2, 1996, with the arrangement and assistance of Zhang Ziqiang and Chen Zhihao, the appellant Hui Liang and others smuggled the above-mentioned guns and ammunition into China. At noon on May 23rd, 6o, I received a phone call from Ke Xianting and learned about Li's whereabouts, that is, carrying guns, hammers and other tools. Someone kidnapped the victim Li and his driver Lin near 80 Deep Water Bay Road in Hong Kong. And went to the Li family to collect a ransom of HK$ 65.438+38 billion, and then released the victims. Zhang Ziqiang received HK$ 362 million and Chen Zhihao received HK$ 295 million. 1997 at the beginning, the appellant attempted to kidnap Hong Kong citizen Guo Moumou and instructed him to observe Guo Moumou's whereabouts. Zhang Zhi told Hu, Chen and others about the kidnapping plot. Later, Zhang Ziqiang colluded with the above-mentioned conspirators in Guangzhou Shengli Hotel, Wudong Huaqiao Building, Shenzhen Guangdong Bank Building Fountain Restaurant and other places, and carried out specific division of labor. During this period, Hu and Hu invested more than 2 million Hong Kong dollars and 200,000 yuan respectively to prepare for committing crimes. Hu also conspired with Gan Yongqiang and Deng Lixian to participate in the kidnapping. At noon on September 29th of the same year, I received a phone call and learned about Guo's whereabouts. He kidnapped Guo to No.200 Angang Road, Hong Kong, and settled with Gan Yongqiang, Deng Lixian and others near the bottom of Hong Kong Beach Road Highway Bridge. After receiving a ransom of HK$ 600 million from Guo, the victim's family was released. After committing the crime, Zhang Ziqiang got HK$ 300 million. 1from may to August 1995, the appellant hid a batch of illegally obtained explosives in Luo's rental house in Shenzhen. Since then, Han Fa and Luo have been instructed twice to give explosives to others. After receiving these explosives, Chen Zhihao hid them in Bofulin Mountain. After solving the case, 25.4 kilograms of explosives were seized in Pokfulam. 1995, the appellant Chen Zhihao put 13 pistol bullets, 4 shotgun bullets and 10 detonators into a tea can, which was hidden in Room A2 of Shenzhen Qiajing Garden and Heping Pavilion, and was later seized. At the beginning of 1997, the appellant instructed Han Fa to buy a May 4th pistol and 16 bullets in Shenzhen, and Han gave them to hide. From August to September of the same year, Luo Zhiping was instructed to buy a Lei Guang shotgun and 26 rounds of shotgun bullets. Luo Zhiping took the guns and bullets to Shenzhen to pay for Luo's hiding expenses. Then, he instructed to take shotguns and bullets from Luo and hide them in the S mansion. After solving the case, the above guns and ammunition were seized. The American court of Guangdong Higher People's Court held that although some of the crimes alleged in this case were committed in Hong Kong, the preparations for organizing and planning crimes all took place in the mainland; Guns, explosives and major criminal tools were illegally purchased from the mainland and smuggled into Hong Kong. According to Article 24 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), mainland courts have jurisdiction over this case according to law. Appellant Zhang Ziqiang bought explosives from Qian Hanshou, and instructed Liu Dingxun to contact and cooperate with others to load, unload and transfer the purchased explosives. These plots are confirmed by the confessions of Zhang Ziqiang, Qian Hanshou and Liu Dingxun, as well as the seized explosives and tools for committing crimes. Zhang Ziqiang and Qian Hanshou violated the national laws and regulations on explosives management and illegally bought and sold explosives, endangering public safety. It violates the first paragraph of Article 125 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), which constitutes the crime of illegally buying and selling explosives, and the amount of illegal buying and selling explosives is huge.

Qian Hanshou and his defenders believe that Qian Hanshou is an accessory to the crime of transporting explosives instead of donating T and illegally buying and selling explosives. The plot is minor and inconsistent with the facts. The appellant's robbery is a violent crime, and Li is the person directly responsible. Death. In two robberies of gold shops in Hong Kong, they not only planned and directed, but also directly carried out the robbery. The appellant's violence against Li was one of the direct murderers of the robbery and one of the reasons for Li's death. In the gold shop robbery in Wuhua Street, Hong Kong, he threatened with a gun and shot to resist arrest. The appellant is one of the direct killers of Li. In the robbery, Li threatened, beat and strangled someone. My own confessions and those of several co-defendants proved these conspiracies. For the purpose of illegal possession, Ma robbed others of their property through armed violence and coercion. Their behavior violated the second paragraph of Article 150 of the Criminal Law 1979, which constituted the crime of robbery. The amount of robbery is huge and the circumstances are serious. In the joint crime, the horse plays a major role and is the principal offender. They should be punished according to all the crimes they organized, directed or participated in. The original sentence is appropriate. Chen Zhihao and his defenders said that robbery caused death and the sentencing was biased; In the case that the public security organ has not yet grasped the fact of his second robbery in Hong Kong, it should first hand it over to the police, give up his accomplice, and regard it as surrender and significant meritorious service, as well as the defense reasons and opinions demanding a lighter punishment; Ma and his defender appealed, denying that he was the principal offender in the robbery, and his arguments and opinions demanding a lighter punishment were rejected. The plaintiffs Zhang Ziqiang, Chen Zhihao and Hui Liang kidnapped others for the purpose of extorting property, which violated the provisions of the third paragraph of Article 2 of the Decision of the National People's Congress and constituted the crime of kidnapping. The amount of extortion was extremely huge and the circumstances were serious. Zhang Ziqiang committed crimes in both kidnapping cases, and invested in crime tools and shared a huge ransom. These circumstances are confirmed by the confession of himself and his accomplices, the identification of the plot and location, the kidnapping scene, the tools for committing crimes, the receipt for withdrawal, and the power of attorney issued by the victim. It is fully proved that Zhang Ziqiang and Chen Zhihao played the role of organization and command in the kidnapping joint crime, and they are the principal offenders, and should be punished according to all the crimes they organized and commanded; Hui Liang is an accessory and should be given a lighter or mitigated punishment according to law. The original sentence is appropriate. Zhang Ziqiang and his defender appealed that there was not enough evidence to determine the crime of kidnapping. They applied for new evidence, and the reason could not be established. The appellant violated customs regulations, evaded customs supervision and smuggled guns and ammunition out of the country. Their actions violated Article 1 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Supplementary Provisions on Punishment of Smuggling Crimes of the Standing Committee of the US Congress, which constituted the crime of smuggling weapons and ammunition, and the circumstances were particularly serious. In the joint crime, Zhang Ziqiang and Chen Zhihao play the role of organization and command, and are the principal offenders. They should be punished according to all the crimes they organized and directed. Ma and his accomplices should be given a lighter or mitigated punishment according to law. The original sentence is appropriate. Zhang Ziqiang and his defenders appealed that smuggling weapons and ammunition was for the purpose of kidnapping and should be recognized as the crime of kidnapping. The reason for not being convicted independently cannot be established. The appellant, Chen Zhihao, violated the national regulations on explosives management and illegally transported explosives with others.

Zhang Ziqiang's defenders in the United States believe that Zhang Ziqiang should be given a lighter punishment for reporting meritorious deeds and providing criminal clues during the second trial. The Criminal Investigation Bureau of Guangdong Provincial Public Security Bureau confirmed that Zhang Yuqiang's allegations could not be verified and did not constitute meritorious service. To sum up, the first-instance judgment found that the facts were clear, the evidence was true and sufficient, the conviction was accurate, and the sentencing of the appellants Ma and Qian Hanshou was appropriate. The reasons for the appeal of the five people and the defense reasons of their defenders cannot be established and should be rejected.

Accordingly, the Guangdong Intermediate People's Court of the Higher People's Court made a judgment of 1998 65438+ on February 4th according to the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 189 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC):

The first-instance judgment of Appellant Ma and Qian Hanshou was upheld.

According to the notice of the Supreme People's Court on authorizing the higher people's court to approve some death penalty cases, the Guangdong Higher People's Court approved the criminal sentences of appellant Ma and Qian Hanshou, who were sentenced to death and deprived of political rights for life.