As a result, The Rebel Angel became a bad film, Deng Chao was praised as "hard funny" and the Queen was dragged into the water ... Although watching movies is a collective behavior, each audience will only choose what they want to see, so while some viewers think the film is good-looking, there are definitely some viewers who don't. But it is obviously biased to elevate this film to a useless height just because it is not good-looking. The villain angel adapted from the stage play obviously continues the stage play style too much in some cinematic scenes, which makes the whole movie look a little more exaggerated than the traditional movie: for example, walking in a straight line with a knife to express the role's ignorance of "turning" and expressing Murphy's nostalgia for "the voice of childhood" with fear of noise have become vulgar. But in another way, it becomes elegant: if the angel with the knife is replaced by Emily's angel, is it "angels love beauty"? If Murphy's nostalgia for his childhood voice is replaced by his nostalgia for the old house, can he make another film, Deep in Flowers? But they are different performance arts, but they are stubbornly divided into three or six categories. This is film criticism-film criticism is an over-interpretation, depending on how you handle this "degree".