Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Take-out food franchise - Environmental protection is not only an environmental protection issue, but also a political issue, which is the embodiment of the government's ruling ability.
Environmental protection is not only an environmental protection issue, but also a political issue, which is the embodiment of the government's ruling ability.

the other debater thinks that if he has the power and power to deal with the pollution problem, he thinks that environmental protection is the main responsibility. However, who is mainly responsible for what is meant by having power and strength? What is it? The right to exercise national sovereignty. According to the logic of the other debater, well, we don't need to argue. Why? Everyone has given power. Do we still need to talk about whose power is great? Is it necessary to discuss whose main responsibility is? Therefore, the premise of the opponent's defense is wrong.

first, from the root cause of environmental problems, it is mainly who pollutes, and who is mainly responsible. Whether it's water pollution

air pollution, land desertification, endangered species besieged by garbage

, unrestrained resource consumption and pollution in personal consumption behavior and lifestyle are the root causes of environmental deterioration. Don't mistake the ability to deal with pollution for the main responsibility of the wrongdoer. We can't force everyone's consumption behavior, nor can we stipulate everyone's lifestyle.

third, in the environmental protection action, the organizer needs to serve, but both the implementer and the beneficiary are individuals. In terms of specific implementation, we advocate the 5R theory of the international environmental protection organization, that is, Reduce saves resources, Reuse uses it many times, Reevaluate green consumption, Recycle recycling, and save everything!

it is indeed a responsibility to protect the environment, but in fact, we know that environmental protection is everyone's job and the carrier of personal life. Individuals here have human attributes and can all be called individuals. Therefore, individuals can be environmental protection organizers and volunteers, such as GREEN

PEACE, economists, politicians and educators. In short, environmental protection is related to the survival of individuals, and environmental protection is mainly personal responsibility.

the second part: the defensive point of the opposing side: environmental protection is mainly a personal responsibility. 1. From the perspective of the world, it is the country that is polluted and blamed.

Refutation: This is our daily work. Just like family planning, many policies and regulations have been issued, but is the birth process mainly up to you? Please consult again ... 4. Strong strength and stronger environmental protection ability than individuals

Refutation: Yes, environmental protection is one of the jobs, but environmental protection is related to everyone's survival and development. According to your analogy, isn't the life problem worse than your routine? 6. Environmental protection is more planning and professional.

Refutation: (1) Are we more effective than others? Today, we are discussing who is responsible, not to see who is strong, but to let everyone really understand from the consciousness that this is everyone's responsibility and an unshirkable way to survive!

rebuttal: in fact, you are talking about personal pollution of the environment. If you want to deal with the aftermath, it is equivalent to a child taking a dump and needing his mother to help him clean it. But after all, the child has to clean it himself. The other debater can't ask your mother to help you clean it all his life! 8. When carrying out environmental protection, many local residents don't cooperate, and they have to come to reward and punish them before they are willing to cooperate. < P > Refutation: Yes! These residents, just like the other debaters, mistakenly believe that environmental protection is mainly a responsibility and blindly shirk their personal responsibilities. Do you still think this is reasonable? 9, large-scale environmental protection projects, a lot of money to support

Refutation: whoever pollutes, who is responsible! If a child breaks a vase, he may not have the money to pay compensation, and his parents need to bear it, but can the ability to pay compensation be equated with the responsibility to pay compensation? 12. There are two kinds of responsibilities, one is education, and the other is large-scale projects. Can you do it yourself? (p) (2) You should not neglect your personal infection ability. As the saying goes, if you see a person who is active in environmental protection, people around you will join in!

Part III: Four Debates (Framework)

Now let's take a look at the logic of the other debaters today: they think that they have power, financial resources, ability and guidance, and they have made some obvious achievements in the process of environmental protection, so they have decided that environmental protection is mainly a responsibility. According to this logic, it can be concluded that the rise and fall of the world is mainly the responsibility of powerful generals, not the tens of thousands of people in Qian Qian; Economic construction is mainly the responsibility of wealthy families, not every citizen; Learning is mainly the responsibility of teachers with guiding ability, not the students themselves. Obviously, this logic is silly and naive.

Therefore, under such a wrong logic, the other party's argument is completely untenable: 1, 2, 3,

We emphasize that environmental protection is mainly personal responsibility, that is, to arouse everyone's sense of responsibility and protect our homeland consciously and actively. Environmental protection is to prevent the deterioration of the natural environment and improve the environment to make it suitable for people's work and life. Since it is to protect human beings themselves, you personally have to take the main responsibility for environmental protection. Every man is responsible for the rise and fall of the world. This is the job, each of us should start from ourselves, and we can't always think about relying on it. The phrase "don't spit everywhere" has been shouted since Dr. Sun Yat-sen at that time, and has been shouted for more than 1 years. Isn't it still that people spit everywhere in the street? Therefore, environmental protection is mainly a personal matter. If you can't do it yourself, how can you ask others to do it?

We only have one Yangtze River. If it is destroyed, it will never come back. We only have one home. If we lose it, we will never have it again. Individuals who should bear the main responsibility in environmental protection, please cherish the foundation on which human beings depend for survival, and please start with bit by bit environmental protection behavior.

Part IV: Serial Questions A

In society, is public security mainly the responsibility of uncles or everyone in society? B

(No, we saw you in the food court the other day ~)

In 24, the theme of World Environment Day was "Everyone is responsible for the survival of the ocean", and in 25, everyone was promoted to create a green home. What's your explanation? 2

Part V: Refutation point 1

In view of personal environmental protection-Mencius' old man has long put forward personal environmental protection methods such as "Countless things don't enter the pool", haven't you learned them? 2

In view of the policy-as early as 24, the State Environmental Protection Administration said that large-scale projects should hold hearings, and the general public should make decisions. Imagine if you can carry out environmental protection projects without our personal main role. Please answer whether you can afford it or not. five