A person's diet largely determines a person's physical condition, and physical condition plays an important role in a person's mental condition. Diet is almost an unavoidable and necessary topic for our survival.
Here I recommend Yoshida Makita's Diet 2. This book is a sequel to the popular scientific diet textbook Nutrition in Japan. This book is based on the theory and logic of "natural diet method conforming to human DNA", specifically debunking 16' s lies about diet, introducing in detail the best intake methods of sugar, lipid and protein, and pointing out what to eat and how to eat is the real healthy diet, including meat, fish and shellfish, vegetables, fungi and beans. In the last chapter, in addition to the comprehensive physical examination, the importance of accurate additional examinations such as chest and abdomen CT examination, gastroscopy and brain MRI examination to health is also mentioned.
Makita Shinji, a Japanese diabetes expert and doctor of medicine, is a pioneer in the world. He has successfully developed a method to measure the age of blood. As the first author, he has published papers in the world's top magazines such as Science, The Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine.
It is almost impossible for people to know what went wrong. The reason why we fall into the wrong situation of what to eat and how to eat is largely because we don't realize that we are wrong. Just like many people mistakenly think that gluten-free and sugar-free. But in fact, "gluten" refers to a kind of protein contained in wheat, which is one of allergens. Gluten-free food is very helpful to people who are allergic to wheat. In this kind of food, rice flour is mostly used instead of wheat flour. So this kind of food is high in sugar. "
Especially for some packaged foods, even if the food manufacturer marks the ingredient list truthfully and in detail, people will eat against their will because they know little or nothing about the nutritional value of the ingredients. We should have the habit of reading the food ingredient list, and also have the ability to read the ingredient list.
It may also be wrong to eat with the original idea of eating for health. The fundamental reason for this situation lies in the unwillingness to further understand the original cognition.
Of course, this ability can't be acquired overnight. It needs our patience to gradually accumulate and sometimes look for it. And it's best to check it yourself. On the one hand, you can learn more about some ingredients according to your own situation, on the other hand, it is difficult to guarantee the accuracy of health knowledge learned from others.
Part of the reason for eating mistakes is the poor information between us and food manufacturers. We don't know whether some originally healthy foods have been polluted in production, processing, transportation, packaging and sales.
Yoshida Makita pointed out in Diet 2 that "milk itself is not bad. The question is what kind of environment cows are raised in and how milk is made into commodities. " Indeed, it is not excluded that some bad food production enterprises will feed antibiotics to cattle in order to avoid cross-infection in cattle houses; Even in order to make cattle grow rapidly, fattening agents are fed to cattle. In fact, milk will lose nutrients such as lactic acid bacteria during high temperature sterilization. From the above analysis, "drinking milk is good for health" is not absolutely correct.
To jump out of the trap of information gap with food production enterprises, first of all, the cost of food that can be produced safely and with high quality in the whole chain must be higher than that of inferior food produced by rough machining. Of course, this can't be generalized, but overall, you might as well spend more money on this matter. Secondly, the original ecological food is mostly superior to the packaged and processed food. If you can eat fresh fruits and vegetables, why eat juice? Even if the label is advertised as original without adding, how much is worth believing?
"What to eat" and "how to eat" complement each other. The food itself is useless and even toxic, even steaming this healthy diet is useless. Food itself is beneficial, but if you use the wrong diet, it is ineffective. For example, eating fruit on an empty stomach will make the blood sugar level rise linearly.
Eating green and healthy is a tedious task, and you must not be lazy. Just as some people have realized the importance of lipids to all parts of the body. But its intake of lipids is "almost enough." This practice is obviously unhealthy. "The same is the intake of 100 grams of meat, the' meat material' in the burger of a fast food restaurant, or the chicken leg meat of free-range chickens in a good environment. The quality of the two will be completely different. " I know which approach is appropriate, but because of my casual attitude, I often feel that unhealthy food and unhealthy diet are the most deadly. Because many a mickle does harm to the body irreversibly.
Of course, "what to eat" and "how to eat" also vary from person to person, and there is no guarantee that medical books suitable for general readers will meet everyone's specific physical needs. Therefore, independent thinking, comprehensive consideration, accurate understanding of one's body and authoritative endorsement of reference books can lead to a healthy self.
Diet is a university question. Diet 2 written by Makita is undoubtedly one of the street lamps and is worth reading. We can grasp the correct understanding of diet, jump out of the trap created by food manufacturers for profit, and then eat healthy food in strict accordance with healthy eating methods. We can also take a healthy step in eating this thing.