(1) Start with ideological education and strengthen the supervisory awareness of power subjects. The most basic thing to strengthen the supervision of the power of leading cadres is to enable the power subjects to establish a strong awareness of supervision. If the power subjects do not even have a basic awareness of supervision, then supervision will be just talk on paper. Therefore, to strengthen the supervision of the power of leading cadres, the most basic measure is to start with ideological education and focus on strengthening the two consciousnesses of power subjects, namely: the consciousness of power subjects to consciously accept supervision and the consciousness of proactively and boldly supervising others. The depth of ideological understanding determines the attitude of supervision. Party organizations at all levels must adopt effective methods and methods to strengthen the ideological and political education of leading cadres, especially the education of ideals and beliefs, the party's purpose and mass line, and firmly establish a correct world view, outlook on life, values ??and power; they must strengthen laws and regulations and education on party and government disciplines and rules, so that leading cadres can deeply learn and understand the party and government disciplines and rules, and consciously abide by the party's disciplines and national laws and regulations, thereby becoming more self-respecting, self-policing, self-reflective, and self-motivated, and improving their awareness of supervision. It is necessary to strengthen the party spirit education of leading cadres so that every party member cadre understands that within our party, regardless of their position, party members have equal status. They must not only supervise others, but also accept supervision from others. Everyone is supervised and everyone is subject to supervision. supervision. Party members and leading cadres with high positions have great influence on the cause, and they must consciously accept supervision and supervise others well. The main body of power must fully realize the great significance of supervision politically through education, proceed from safeguarding the cause of the party, fully realize that it is the rights and obligations of party members to accept supervision and supervise others, and conscientiously implement the "Party Constitution" and "Regulations on Inner-Party Supervision" "The supervisory functions conferred by the Constitution are responsibilities, responsibilities and obligations. Failure to perform them would be dereliction of duty. Therefore, we must adhere to the principle and consciously accept supervision while strengthening supervision of other power subjects.

(2) Strictly implement responsibilities and enhance the effectiveness of mutual supervision. The mutual supervision between team members at the same level, because they know each other thoroughly, both in terms of participation and knowledge, is more powerful than other organizations and supervision, and the effect of supervision is unmatched by other supervisions. Therefore, in strengthening the supervision of the power of leading cadres, we must give full play to the advantages of mutual supervision and enhance the effectiveness of mutual supervision. First, we must fully understand the characteristics of mutual supervision. Mutual supervision has inherent characteristics. Mutual supervision among team members is within the party organization, emphasizing the use of the party's ideology, organization, and discipline to restrain party members and leading cadres. Characteristics of initiative. Mutual supervision among team members is a proactive preventive measure. It is not only a kind of post-event supervision, but also focuses on supervision before and during the event, emphasizing the preventive role and reducing the occurrence of bad tendencies and behaviors within the party. Because they know each other better, supervision can be accurate, targeted, and highly targeted. Second, we must establish a work responsibility system for mutual supervision, highlighting the consciousness of mutual supervision and the compulsory force based on consciousness. The responsibility system is an important guarantee for the implementation of work. We must conscientiously implement the "Regulations on Inner-Party Supervision", effectively establish an effective responsibility mechanism for team members to supervise each other, clarify the supervisory responsibilities and guarantees of each team member in the form of a system, and ensure that the team members Members can only act and make a difference. At the same time, an accountability system for mutual supervision should be established. For a team, if one member has a problem and other members fail to fulfill their mutual supervision responsibilities, the responsibilities should be clarified in a prescribed form. This can not only enhance the consciousness of team members to supervise each other, but also highlight its compulsory nature. Only the organic unity and combination of coercion and consciousness can realize mutual supervision among team members. Third, we must pay attention to supervision methods. It is necessary to firmly establish the idea that mutual supervision is a kind of care for comrades, rather than offending or making things difficult for others. In addition to fully expressing opinions at relevant meetings, there should also be more exchanges and heart-to-heart talks with each other in normal times. For supervisory opinions that are inconsistent in understanding but should be adhered to, the interests should be clearly stated, strive to be adopted, and supervision work should be done in the front; We must seriously and responsibly criticize the "out of line" behavior of team members, advise them in a timely manner, and solve the problem in the bud. Major issues must be reported to the relevant superior departments in a timely manner. Fourth, we must give full play to the role of the democratic life association. The democratic life meeting is an effective measure for leading cadres to educate themselves and solve problems on their own. Criticism and self-criticism are an effective and good way to solve intra-party problems that our party has proven in practice.

Carefully grasp the three links of the democratic life meeting before, during and after the meeting. Through the democratic life meeting, carefully check and carry out criticism and self-criticism, find out the problems that exist in the team and individuals, and "prescribe the right medicine" after the meeting to provide targeted solutions. Take proactive measures to resolve it.

(3) Improve the supervision system, conduct supervision strictly according to the system, and enhance the effectiveness of supervision. Strengthening system construction and relying on the legal system to improve the party's style is an important guiding ideology for Comrade Deng Xiaoping to strengthen the party's style and clean government. Comrade Xiaoping said: "System issues are more fundamental, overall, stable and long-term." As a work procedure that requires everyone to abide by it, the system has a strict normative role and a clear behavioral orientation. It is the criterion for the exercise of power by leading cadres, the yardstick for standard management and law enforcement and discipline, and the supervision and leadership of the masses inside and outside the party. The basis for cadres. Therefore, supervision through the establishment and improvement of relevant systems is an important guarantee for strengthening the supervision of the power of leading cadres. First, the system must be established strictly. The following principles must be mastered: key people, key departments and key issues must be grasped to strengthen the construction of the supervision system; it must be targeted and systematic to form a comprehensive supervision and control system; it must be mandatory and binding; and there must be quantitative standards , should not be too general or too principled; it should be operable and minimize flexibility to facilitate supervision by the organization and the masses; rewards and punishments should be clear and practical penalty clauses should be formulated. The second is to improve power norms. Focus on strengthening the construction of "decentralization", "return of power" and "power reduction" systems, grasp the rules of power operation, and accelerate the establishment of a power operation mechanism with reasonable structure, scientific allocation, strict procedures and mutual constraints. With the direction of power checks and balances, we should gradually decompose overly concentrated power, achieve reasonable empowerment, put the operation of power in a state of effective checks and balances, and prevent corruption caused by overly concentrated power. By deepening the reform of the government's administrative approval system, reducing administrative approval matters and returning power to the market, such as replacing administrative approval behaviors through market means such as government procurement, bidding, and auctions. Reduce discretion in administrative review and approval to minimize discretion and restrict and prevent the arbitrary use of review and approval power. The third is to persist in institutional innovation. On the one hand, we must speed up the establishment of a modern administrative system and standardize official conduct in accordance with the law. Compared with the modern civil service system, our country's civil service system still has many flaws and has not yet been elevated to the level of a basic system of a legal country. Therefore, it is necessary to speed up the establishment of a modern administrative system, standardize public behavior in accordance with the law, and realize the clean and efficient function of the modern civil service system as soon as possible. On the other hand, we must speed up the improvement of the modern legal system and advance anti-corruption legislation. Since our country has not yet established a legal system for national civil servants, many current corruption phenomena occur due to loopholes in laws and regulations. Therefore, there is an urgent need to formulate relevant laws and regulations to regulate and restrict it. At present, we should focus on governing power according to law, promptly upgrade relatively complete, systematic, and mature institutional regulations to the level of national laws, intra-party regulations, and administrative regulations, accelerate the legislative process of power supervision, and build a legal system. The "Supervision Law" and the "Integrity Law" should be promulgated as soon as possible, improve various supervision systems and procedures, legalize the power operation mechanism, and ensure the consciousness and initiative of leading cadres to be honest in politics from an institutional and legal perspective. Fourth, the implementation system must be strict. The key to the supervision system over the power of leading cadres lies in implementation. No matter how good the norms and systems are, they are nothing if they are not implemented and executed.

Therefore, as a leading cadre, you must first take the lead in implementation and set an example. Secondly, in accordance with the requirements of the responsibility system for the construction of party style and clean government, we must conscientiously supervise the implementation of the supervision system and supervise the implementation of responsibilities at one level. Each level shall be responsible for the first level, and the implementation shall be carried out at all levels. If there is a problem at any level, who should be responsible for it. Whoever is responsible must be held firmly accountable. Once again, discipline and law enforcement must be strictly enforced. Those who do not follow the rules must be criticized in a timely manner and those who should be criticized and educated must be rectified within a time limit. Those who should be punished by law and discipline must be dealt with resolutely, and it must not be repeated.

(4) Check through practical operations and enhance the joint force of organizational supervision. The key to organizational supervision is to solve the problem of the right to know about the supervisory capabilities of higher-level organizations, the supervision of organizations at the same level knowing but not dare to act, and the supervision of lower-level organizations neither knowing nor acting. The focus is to strengthen the supervision of the three types of organizations and strengthen the supervision of the power of leading cadres from three directions. First, we must strengthen top-down supervision by superior organizations. This is a kind of supervision that uses power to restrict power, is the most acceptable and most effective. The main thing is to take measures to shorten the distance in time and space, and work hard on how to be informed. Therefore, higher-level organizations must strengthen supervision, inspection and guidance of lower-level organizations, especially top leaders. During inspections and supervision, they must not just watch things happen and "score" based on reports or impressions. This often fails to play a supervisory role.

Superiors can regularly or irregularly listen to the reports of the "top leaders" on the construction and ideological work of the subordinates through anti-corruption debriefing, anti-corruption reports, anti-corruption talks, etc., so as to timely understand the thoughts and integrity status of the "top leaders". It is necessary to regularly go deep into lower-level organizations to understand the party style and integrity of top leaders and team members through individual conversations and other forms. You can also learn about relevant situations by convening symposiums at different levels. To strengthen audit supervision, it is absolutely necessary to conduct a special audit of subordinates every year to understand the integrity of subordinates. When necessary, we can also use methods such as dispatching personnel to inspect, covert visits, and public opinion surveys to more objectively and truly grasp and understand some practical and deep-seated problems, so that we can prescribe the right medicine and educate and save cadres in a timely manner. Second, we must strengthen the supervision of functional departments at the same level. Under my country's current political system, disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies, as supervisory agencies of party committees and governments at the same level, are often unable to do their best in supervision and are in a weak position in supervision. It is necessary to improve the administrative standards of discipline inspection and supervision agencies. The laws of supervision tell us that for effective supervision, the status of the subject and the object must be equal. Therefore, it is necessary to give the disciplinary inspection agency the same level specifications as the party committee and government at the same level to avoid the situation of supervising others while standing "under the roof" of others. "Weak situation. It is necessary to strengthen the vertical leadership relationship of discipline inspection agencies to ensure that they independently perform their supervisory duties without interference from other party and government agencies, social groups and individuals. It is necessary to reform the appointment and dismissal method of personnel of lower-level disciplinary inspection agencies. Staff of lower-level disciplinary inspection agencies should be appointed and removed by higher-level disciplinary inspection agencies on the basis of soliciting the opinions of the party committee and government where the lower-level disciplinary inspection agencies are located. At the same time, it is necessary to give full play to the functions of specialized supervision agencies such as organization, auditing, procuratorial, and supervisory bodies, further strengthen management and coordination, fully mobilize their enthusiasm, and jointly participate in the supervision and management of "top leaders" to form a "top leaders" "The combined force of supervision. Third, we must strengthen bottom-up supervision of lower-level organizations. Although lower-level organizations are under the leadership of higher-level organizations, they still have full supervisory rights over higher-level organizations. On the basis of allowing subordinates to have the full right to know, superiors should further improve and improve the reporting, exposing, complaining, accusing, petitioning and other systems, smooth channels for reporting problems, and effectively ensure that organizations and party members and cadres at each level are responsible for party and government leading cadres, especially party and government leading cadres. The democratic right to supervise and restrict the exercise of power by the "top leaders". When subordinate organizations implement the decisions, orders, decisions, etc. of their superiors, they should report to their superiors objectively, fairly, timely, and unreservedly on the problems discovered in order to promote the development of the party's cause, so as to avoid some problems. Wrong decisions cause greater losses, achieving the effect of supervising superiors and correcting their mistakes.

(5) Open supervision channels and continuously enhance the democratic nature of supervision. First, we must improve the people's awareness of power supervision. It is necessary to correct those one-sided ideological understandings that mention mass supervision and mass participation in supervision as engaging in mass movements, and mention public opinion supervision as violating the "main theme." It is necessary to educate the masses to enhance their sense of ownership, enhance their awareness of democratic participation, and correctly exercise their democratic rights. The second is to give full play to the supervisory role of deputies to the National People's Congress. The standing committees of people's congresses at all levels may consider setting up a special integrity supervision committee to strengthen supervision of their appointed and elected officials, especially those with power over people, finances, and property, through regular or irregular organization of people's congress deputies Carry out law enforcement inspections, work reports and reviews, direct investigation and hearings and other forms to check whether government departments are administering in accordance with the law, whether power is exercised in accordance with procedures, and whether collective decision-making, reasonable decentralization of power, and open use of power are carried out. It is necessary to guide people's representatives to correctly exercise their right to participate in major national decisions, to exercise their right to elect, recall, and impeach state leading cadres at all levels, and to express serious and responsible political opinions through legal channels. The third is to open up channels for public supervision such as interviews and complaints. On the one hand, in order to realize the legalization and standardization of mass supervision, we can consider issuing "Citizen Supervision Detailed Rules" through the legislative process to clarify the nature, tasks, powers, obligations and procedures of citizen supervision. On the other hand, it is necessary to establish and improve a mass reporting network and a protection mechanism for mass reporting, and criminal liability for retaliation against whistleblowers and petitioners must be investigated in accordance with the law. Fourth, we must actively explore and establish a supervision mechanism based on the people. Use legal forms to protect the implementation of the people's right to supervise, that is, the exercise of any power must be checked and tested by the people, and what can and cannot be decided in a democratic manner, so that the right of supervision can be truly and freely returned to the people. The society is returned to the people, thus putting the decision-making power of the cadres' fate into the hands of the masses in a veritable manner. Fifth, we must strengthen the function of news supervision.

It is necessary to formulate a "Press Law" to regulate the status, responsibilities and news reports of journalists under the principle of press freedom, emphasize the objectivity and authenticity of news reports, and make them truly become a mouthpiece for publicizing national laws. Make the exercise of power of leading cadres under the supervision of the news media. At the same time, we must reform the news system, implement news independence like judicial independence, and create news competition. Journalists are only responsible to the law, to the people, and to authenticity, and they expose the abuse of power and the scandal of power-for-money transactions in broad daylight.