The so-called middle-class symbol is more unnecessary. In fact, the rise of avocado has something to do with the publicity and hype of the American agricultural consortium. A group of online celebrity from Facebook Instagram and Tumblr have brought the whole avocado industry to fire through fitness and health preservation. In China, because cities outside Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou are relatively rare, they are naturally sought after by the media as a symbol of "middle class", creating a false consumer carnival and petty bourgeoisie. Of course, I especially agree with Lin Tingqian's point of view. Some people criticize the middle class with rhythm through this topic (although I don't admit that the middle class exists in Marxist theory), and their intentions are very doubtful. After all, when a big V thought that there was something that made you tremble, he cursed that most of our answers were petty bourgeoisie, and "it would be uglier to die than the victims in the answer". After all, many people are unwilling to directly criticize the western capital's marketing of avocados, but are more conducive to attack. It is the middle-class cancer in many big V mouths that is convenient to break the pot, and it is always cheap to attack the aesthetics of China people. I'm really curious. What is the middle class in China? Is it over 1 million years old or more than three suites in first-tier cities? An avocado should not distinguish between income classes. What distinguishes it is the contempt chain that many people are provoked by the free market and mainstream media. Of course, such people include myself. After all, the annual salary of many big V's is not necessarily enough to buy a house in a first-tier city. It is absurd to despise the spiritual middle class in this way.