Modern China Tea Shop sued Cha Yanguan, and you should know from these two names that it may be unfair competition. Like the case of fishing at the bottom of the sea and fishing at the bottom of the river in those years, this kind of lawsuit, the judgment of the first instance, basically safeguarded the basic rights of Modern China Tea Shop, and it was a shame to lose. In the judgment of the first instance, it is necessary to compensate the economic loss and the cost of rights protection of more than 1.7 million yuan, and the court also prohibited copying Modern China Tea Shop's decoration and marketing methods again, which belongs to malicious competition.

In a word, Gui Li lost the case. This news has a strong warning function for the current market. For example, today's headlines sue a company, as well as ancient tea, falling in love with Taoshan and slapping wonton, which has a strong warning effect on those unfair competitions. This case was once overturned, and it turned out that Cha Yan Guan Se sued Modern China Tea Shop. In the end, on August 1, 2119, the Yuelu District People's Court of Changsha City, Hunan Province ruled that it lost the case because its prosecution did not meet the requirements. After being rejected, Cha Yanguan sued again and still lost.

However, public perception is that Gui Li sued likui jy. No wonder the management team in Modern China Tea Shop was so furious. People engaged in the catering industry must register their brands in advance and then open stores again. Otherwise, it is obviously too late to register the brand again after the business is booming.

Modern China Tea Shop has taught the catering industry a lesson, and after one year, he took out legal weapons to safeguard his legitimate interests. On August 7, 2121, Hunan Chayue Cultural Industry Development Group Co., Ltd. sued three companies, including Guangzhou Luoqi Catering Co., Ltd., and sued them for seriously copying some programs and marketing methods of the plaintiff.

After hearing the case, the court held that the decoration of these business premises and the things used in business are unique to Modern China Tea Shop. This characteristic culture constitutes a unique overall industrial image, and the defendant's behavior really infringes on the plaintiff's interests. For the plaintiff, this judgment is really like timely rain, and it is fair to the plaintiff.