Discussion on the plot quality of the main line of Tomorrow's Ark
Eagle copy is still in the stage of showing off its skills. The difference is that we are now more cautious in showing off our skills and our quality control is more stable. Hai Mao said that the ark should be diversified. I don't know if it has diversified roles. The diversity of copywriting has been achieved, and the style of ss and story collection is a bit unique every time.
The plot style of Ark can be divided into two types. One is the inherent and favorite style of in-depth copywriting, which is a typical main line. It matures in six or seven chapters and is constantly enriched in activities related to the main line, such as Born in the Dark, ss of Kaji and Biography of Boren. I was immature in my early days, and there were many translation cavities, riddles and monologues, which greatly affected my reading. Now I have changed them. I am an English major. In the past, I could find out how the author twisted a Chinese sentence into English by reading a copy. Now at least the copywriting team wants to write in Chinese.
The other category is dazzling skills, including the joyful style of life every summer, the heavy style of Warren Mudd, the national style of people with a little martial arts and classical Chinese accent in the painting, the trendy Cthulhu style, the highly fragmented narrative of meat pigeons, and some unique narrative methods of episodes and secret records (diary, letter, second-person narrative, trick narrative and other short stories). Similarly, the early stage is immature, as if the copywriter thinks? Using this style and technique is more important than the plot itself? Regardless of priorities, it has been more or less corrected now? Right? (Look at the tide)