2, and if the hotel has done its duty of safety and security, the customer at the hotel dinner slipped and fell injured because of the customer's own injuries caused by the customer, then the customer needs to be responsible for their own, the hotel does not need to assume responsibility.
3, if the customer slips and falls the cause of the existence of the hotel's safety and security negligence at the same time the customer himself there are certain reasons, then the two sides need to be based on their respective faults to bear the corresponding responsibility. Customers and hotels on liability by the ambiguity when you can sue the people's court, the people's court judgment decision.
A restaurant lost property who is responsible for
Restaurant and the owner are responsible. In addition to the restaurant should fulfill the obligation to inform the safety, should also actively provide security measures, and do a good job of monitoring, full-angle set up monitoring equipment for consumers to create an assured consumption environment. In the event of theft, should also cooperate with the public security organs to investigate and collect evidence. Therefore, although the wall is posted on the "please take care of property" warning, but also can not be exempted from its responsibility to pay compensation, the owner of the loss of the law to claim compensation. The owner himself obviously did not fulfill the duty of care and custody of property, that is to say, for the loss of property, restaurants and the owner are at fault, so the owner himself should also bear some responsibility.
Two, the supermarket claims, the insurance company how to compensate?
Supermarket customers injured insurance compensation request: first of all, the insurance company to compensate for the supermarket's property damage, and then by the insurance company to the supermarket or third-party claims.
1, the supermarket did not fulfill the safety and security obligations, resulting in customer damage, should bear the tort liability.
2, customers injured in the supermarket because of the third party's behavior caused damage, the third party to bear the tort liability. Supermarket managers or organizers have not fulfilled the obligation of safety and security, by its corresponding supplementary responsibility.
Three, the customer fell in the store how to do customers in the store who bear the responsibility for the fall
Customers in the store should be sent to the hospital the first time, and then compensation issues can be resolved through negotiation. If the negotiation fails, the consumer can choose to file a tort lawsuit to the court to obtain the appropriate compensation. First of all should confirm whether the customer fell in the store is the supermarket did not fulfill the obligation of safety, the core lies in whether the reasonable limits of the customer's personal safety and property safety obligations. The store did not take protective measures in the location of easy to produce danger, should be the main responsibility for the damage caused by the customer's fall.
Legal basis
The Chinese People's *** and National Code
Article 198 The operators and managers of hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, airports, stadiums, entertainment venues and other places of business and public *** places, or the organizers of mass events, who fail to fulfill their obligations of safety and security, resulting in damages to other people, shall bear the responsibility for tort. .
Because of the third person's behavior caused damage to others, by the third person to bear the tort liability; operators, managers or organizers have not exhausted the obligation of safety and security, bear the corresponding supplementary responsibility. The operator, manager or organizer of the supplementary responsibility, can be recovered from the third party.
Article 1199 If a person without civil capacity suffers personal injury during his study or life in a kindergarten, school or other educational institution, the kindergarten, school or other educational institution shall bear the responsibility for the infringement of human rights; however, if it can be proved that it has fulfilled its responsibility for the education and management of such a person, the person shall not be held liable for the infringement of human rights.