Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering franchise - A woman in Zhengzhou was told that winning an electric car was invalid when playing with a turntable. What should I do in this case?
A woman in Zhengzhou was told that winning an electric car was invalid when playing with a turntable. What should I do in this case?

I can't afford to play activities. This boss is really a wonder. Recently, in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, a food city opened a lucky draw. After the girl won the first prize battery car, the merchant refused to give it to her employees. Fired? After that, the girl companion couldn't stand it, saying that it was cheating and she couldn't afford to play. The merchant accepted it frankly, but she asked if there was another chance to draw a lottery, and the girl was angry and helpless. She stopped playing and left with a refund.

This is a food city in a shopping mall. Because of its opening, a recharge lottery was held. The prizes were large and small. The first prize was a battery car. After the girl recharged it, she won the first prize under the command of the staff. The girl was overjoyed when she won the prize unexpectedly, and the staff also said that she was lucky, so she went out to go through the formalities. Unexpectedly, the staff who came again said that the lottery was invalid. Their rule was that the pointer was up, and when he drew the lottery, the pointer was down, which didn't count, so she was asked to draw the lottery again. When the girl's boss and colleagues were informed of the situation, they felt aggrieved for the girl one after another. However, the right of interpretation was in the business, and the argument was inconclusive. When the girl was ready to continue to discuss the argument the next day, she was informed that she could get the electric car. When the boss of the business spoke, the pointer was up or down. Does it matter whether the pointer of the lottery roulette wheel is up or down? This is a lucky shooting behavior. After the roulette wheel rotates, it is uncertain when to stop, and the position where the pointer will correspond to the roulette wheel is uncertain. In probability, it makes no difference whether it is up or down. But ... Merchants' understanding is that the winning prize is only counted after the roulette wheel rotates when the pointer is up. Put on a pair, no matter how your consumers understand it, it doesn't matter if you say that I cheat. Anyway, the right to interpret belongs to me, which makes the girls' companions laugh.

In addition, it is a buyer's market at present, and the supply in the market is surplus, especially in the catering industry. Watching the video, the food city should be in a business district, serving office workers. Everyone can choose to eat in the hall or take out food. There are not too many people selling food. Merchants are so headstrong, of course, as consumers, they will sneer at it and not spend in this food city. There are too many other choices, especially when merchants do recharge activities, in order to attract repeat customers, but they have to smash their own signs. It is ridiculous. And, for? Does the merchant have the final interpretation right? It is also clearly stipulated in the Contract Law that if there is any dispute over the understanding of the standard terms, it should be interpreted according to the usual understanding; if there are more than two interpretations of the standard terms, it should be interpreted to the detriment of the party providing the standard terms.

Conclusion: Therefore, there is no difference whether the roulette wheel pointer is pointing up or down, even if there is any difference, this difference should be interpreted according to the usual understanding or the consumer's understanding. An electric car can't be said to be a grand prize, but it's still a pleasant surprise. I didn't expect the other party to disapprove it, and said that the employees at the scene were not their opponents, which means that the employees at the scene came to make fun or make trouble. However, for girls, if the environment and clothes at the scene have reason to believe that the other party is their employees, this may constitute an agency by estoppel, and the consequences of this behavior shall be borne by the merchants.