A woman in Northeast China said the waiter repeatedly served the eaten fish on the table, an incident that aroused everyone's concern, but also able to prove that the rights of consumers are not protected. The owner put all the blame on the waiter, and even showed that the fish had not been touched at all, purely because the woman was looking for trouble, however, such a response is not persuasive. After all, most people don't cause trouble without reason, so since the woman dared to say such things, she was able to prove that the fish was a corresponding problem.

The cause of the incident is that the woman brought her family to this restaurant to eat, ordered the restaurant classic a fish, however, when the fish served up, the woman found that the fish has other people moved traces, so to the waiter to put forward their own views. When the waiter served it up a second time, he found that it was still the same fish that had just been served, and did not replace it, but just turned it over. With such a problem, I think the owner should have apologized in time so that the customer could be demoralized.

However, the boss put all the blame on the waiter, obviously this is no corresponding reason, after all, the waiter is just a part-time job, there is no reason to do so. In addition in addition to pushing the responsibility to the waiter, it also shows that this woman is unreasonable, but the woman's mind is also relatively simple, just posted this video to the Internet. If it is the editor, absolutely must call the appropriate complaint phone, so that the restaurant involved in this matter to get due punishment, we go out to eat is not to bad to come, but want to enjoy the restaurant some food.

In fact, this kind of situation must have been experienced by everyone, can also prove to be the business of the usual routine, and even some things have not been reported out by the netizens. Therefore, regardless of whether this boss knows about this matter, once pursued through the legal avenue, it is difficult to escape responsibility, and even face the phenomenon of closing down the store to apologize. Since the food restaurant, then it should be for the safety of consumers to pay the bill, only then, can let consumers eat at ease eat happy.