There are three ways to solve disputes over franchise contracts: the first is mediation, in which both parties reach a settlement agreement on disputed matters through consultation on the basis of respecting the interests of both parties, thus solving disputes. The second is mediation. Under the auspices of the People's Mediation Committee, both parties resolve the contract disputes between the parties through persuasion and education. If both parties accept mediation and reach an agreement, they may apply to the people's court for making a mediation document, which has the same effect as the effective judgment of the court. The third is arbitration and litigation. After the dispute occurs, if the two parties fail to reach a settlement or mediation, they may bring an arbitration according to the arbitration agreement, or they may bring a lawsuit directly to the people's court. It should be noted that franchise contract disputes are generally franchise contract disputes, and the court of first instance of litigation is the intermediate people's court.

Legal basis: Article 23 of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that a lawsuit brought due to a contract dispute shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court of the defendant's domicile or the place where the contract is performed.

Article 34. The parties to a dispute over a contract or other property rights and interests may, through written agreement, choose a people's court in a place that has a real relationship with the dispute, such as the defendant's domicile, the place where the contract is performed, the place where the contract is signed, the plaintiff's domicile and the place where the subject matter is located, but it shall not violate the provisions of this Law on hierarchical jurisdiction and exclusive jurisdiction.