The relevant regulations of "no food in the park" in Disneyland not only limit consumers' right to choose, but also damage consumers' rights and interests, and it is also a means to help the catering industry monopolize the venue. The price of food in Disneyland is several times or even nearly ten times that of similar products outside the park. Even if the park doesn't force tourists to spend money, visitors are forbidden to bring any food. Parks are not half an hour's work. Drinking water and diet are basic physiological needs. Tourists have no choice but to buy food in the park. Isn't this coercion in disguise?
? In fact, many parent-child amusement parks have regulations prohibiting visitors from bringing food into the park, but Disneyland in the United States and France has no regulations prohibiting visitors from entering the park, while Disneyland in China and Japan prohibits visitors from bringing food.
It is not easy to pick up the weapon of law and say "no" to the overlord clause. There is a lawsuit against Disney's "no food in the park" rule. On June 2, 2065438, a lawyer from Suzhou filed a similar "civil lawsuit" with the People's Court of Pudong New Area, but it was ruled as "inadmissible" by the court. Based on the fact that "the plaintiff believes that' unpacking inspection' and' there is no food in the garden' are tort misinterpretations of the Civil Procedure Law, the plaintiff's claim cannot be established according to law. At present, the parties have applied to the Shanghai High Court for retrial. To a certain extent, this reflects some problems existing in the application of civil litigation to disputes over consumption rules, and also reflects the restrictions of relevant laws and regulations on the independent management right of enterprises and the principle of fair contract.