Secondly, if you can't make a profit or even lose money, why do they want you to run it? What kind of ability can you gain to maintain higher and better performance? If the investors are sober and the operators are sober, then the project should be negotiated under a realistic budget. The key points are: 1. Profit model, when to start making profits, how many months to lose money, where is the market, which month to start turning losses or flat, and how many months to recover costs.
Second, the financial budget, how much investment in the early stage, how much liquidity, how long and how much money is expected to be lost in the early stage, how many people are invited, how many things to buy, how much to spend, and what are the profit points.
Third, in other aspects, there is no risk at all without spending a penny. Losing money is also a loss for investors. What can you do to ensure that you are very careful? What are the criteria for investors to share with you? What hope did you give them? If they lose money in cash, what do you lose? Time? Give it back to you, and the time will be even. If so, I feel that investors are stupid. On the one hand, they don't know when they can make a profit, on the other hand, they don't know how long it will take them to return their money, and on the other hand, they lose money or lose their own money. Operators took control of the store without taking any risks, and they grafted such hopes on others. Investors are naive.
As for how to divide the shares, you should negotiate by yourselves. How to divide shares from a fair perspective is very contradictory. Is it really important to split shares? Or is the profit method the most important?