I'm in favor of complaining, and I'm against such behavior. The article published by Heilongjiang Daily is to plead for Xuexiang. There is nothing wrong with such behavior. According to the market rules, there is no problem at all when the price of tourist attractions is clearly marked at 15 yuan. However, judging from the content of the article, the editor of this article has gone too far. It's often mentioned in it? Smear? 、? Spray? 、? Touch porcelain? Words such as, the meaning in the article shows irony and threat, which should not exist. 1. The event of Xuexiang made a sound
Xuexiang is a tourist attraction, and some sausages in it are clearly priced at 15 yuan each. There's nothing wrong with this price, the market is like this, but some people think it's too expensive. Afterwards, some people on the Internet deliberately smeared, pulled out some old sesame rotten millet things, and even maliciously slandered them. After that, Heilongjiang Daily voiced that Xuexiang was wronged, indicating that it was a normal market law. The voice of the relevant media is normal, and their children have made mistakes in the past and have been rectified. Why should they be wronged after so many years? In line with the laws of the market, clearly marked everything is normal, there is nothing to say. 2, correct behavior and excessive words
The Xuexiang incident was wronged and deliberately discredited by someone on the Internet. It can be said that the person who raised this topic was making much ado about nothing. Heilongjiang Daily complained to Xuexiang. We can understand that there is no need to refute the market economy. But in the article, full of? Smear? 、? Spray? 、? Touch porcelain? Words such as, even said? Internet is not a place of extra-justice? . As a media, it seems threatening to say such a thing. Although some netizens really should know? Isn't the Internet extra-legal? However, the official media said that it would make people feel very strange. And such behavior will generally lower the people's goodwill towards Xuexiang. 3. What should the media do
What the media should do is never to stand on one side and criticize and satirize the other. Instead, we should stand in the middle, let everyone understand their mistakes, and then resolve the grievances. The article in the daily newspaper gives people the impression that it is a big hat and completely magnifies public opinion. You should know that you are an official media, not an ordinary street paparazzi.