Ms. Tian from Changchun rented a facade and opened a supermarket, but parabolic phenomena often appeared in the building. Ms. Tian and the interviewer found the residents involved, and the other party denied throwing it away, saying that it was probably the dog at home. The reporter came to the community to ask about this matter. The secretary of the community said that some people have reflected this matter before and have also carried out governance, but the effect is not satisfactory.

Zhang Guihong, secretary of the Party Committee of Heping Community, Xinchun Street, Nanguan District, Changchun City, said, "Because six buildings belong to relocated buildings, there are more mobile households, so the turnover of personnel is more frequent. Next, we still put up notices in the corridor. If it really doesn't work, we will post notices on the doors of every household, and we will also contact the police station and need their cooperation. "

Extended data

The situation of parabolic "paying for the whole building" will be improved:

Without direct evidence, it is often difficult to identify the direct infringer. Before the introduction of the Civil Code, this kind of behavior was handled in accordance with the Tort Liability Law. If throwing objects in a building causes damage to others, all users of the building who may cause damage shall be liable for compensation if they cannot prove that they are not infringers.

This civil code has made a relatively comprehensive provision on this "leftist clause". Guo believes that the civil code gives the relevant building users the right to continue to recover from the actual infringer after giving compensation to the victim first. In other words, the compensation behavior is no longer the end point, but just a kind of "first payment", and the situation of "one person throwing a parabolic object and paying for the whole building" will be improved.

China Takeaway food was thrown downstairs with soup and water, but residents denied that it was the dog.