according to article 11 of the administrative procedure law, in this case, the dispute between Shuai and a municipal public security bureau belongs to the scope of administrative cases accepted by the people's court, and Shuai can bring an administrative lawsuit. According to Article 18 of the Administrative Procedure Law: "A lawsuit filed against an administrative compulsory measure that restricts personal freedom shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court where the defendant is located or where the plaintiff is located." Accordingly, Shuai can bring a suit in the people's court where the public security bureau of a city is located, or he can bring a suit in the people's court where he is located. According to Article 54 of the Administrative Procedure Law: "After hearing the case, the people's court made the following judgments according to different situations: … (2) If a specific administrative act is under any of the following circumstances, the judgment shall be revoked or partially revoked, and the defendant may be sentenced to re-engage in a specific administrative act: 1. The application of laws and regulations is wrong; 3. Violating legal procedures; 4. Exceeding the authority; 5. Abuse of power ... "In this case, the behavior of the Municipal Public Security Bureau to temporarily detain Shuai's business license and liquor monopoly license is beyond its scope of authority and belongs to ultra vires behavior. Therefore, the people's court should decide to revoke the administrative behavior of a municipal public security bureau.