Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering training - In the process of consumption, have you encountered the "overlord clause"?
In the process of consumption, have you encountered the "overlord clause"?

I think there are actually many such overlord clauses in life, which we often encounter in our daily life.

Most of the time, people can get by, and most of them don't care. In fact, many cases are obvious infringements. As consumers, if you want to be serious, you can really have a good theory and even complain to the Consumers Association.

Let me give you a particularly simple example:

Two days ago, I went to buy sugar oranges, which was a roadside stall. Probably for convenience, the stall owner asked that the minimum purchase amount should not be less than 11 yuan.

at first, I didn't know about this so-called rule. I picked some oranges there, but because that orange was not very good, I was too lazy to pick it. After that, I took it and asked the stall owner to weigh it for me. As a result, it was less than five yuan. The stall owner said he wouldn't sell it for less than ten dollars, so he just took a bunch and put it on the scale for me.

I quit at that time. Your oranges were so bad that I didn't pick out a few good ones for a long time. You brought me a bunch of bad ones, so can I have them?

finally, I broke up with the stall owner. He insisted on not selling it for less than ten yuan. When I got angry, I just stopped buying it.

I think the behavior of the stall owner is an obvious overlord clause. Whoever stipulates that I have to buy enough of that quantity, I can buy as much as I want, and no one cares.

There is also a lot of gossip on the Internet. A deli likes to add scales to customers. People say that a clerk who wants 21 yuan can give him 51 yuan. These are obviously unreasonable and infringe on the rights and interests of consumers.

As a consumer, I can choose not to care, but I can also choose to care. The key lies in whether I have the energy or not.

in our daily life, there are actually many such situations, such as the so-called refusal to take out drinks in restaurants, the refusal to return or exchange special goods in shops and so on.

The so-called regulations of these stores are usually followed by a sentence: The final interpretation right of the activities belongs to our store. This is obvious that there is no silver here. For ordinary people, because they don't know enough about relevant laws, they are led by the nose by merchants. In fact, these behaviors are all overlord clauses, and consumers have every right to refuse.

Many domestic merchants will formulate some "overlord clauses" in order to avoid subsequent troubles. As consumers, if we find that these obviously infringe on our rights and interests, then we can completely refuse to perform. Some people will choose to default to these terms for fear of trouble. In fact, this is a connivance to the infringement of businesses, so that they can hide and take some for granted. Consumers' rights and interests are inviolable, and we should just get up as consumers.