Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Complete cookbook - What punishment will the nanny get for stealing the employer's favorite pot in retaliation?
What punishment will the nanny get for stealing the employer's favorite pot in retaliation?
Two months after the nanny was dismissed, she was still indignant. She went to her former employer's house and stole her employer's favorite frying pan worth 1000 yuan. After the nanny was suspected of burglary, the police took criminal compulsory measures according to law.

The nanny retaliated against her former employer, Zhu. She was a nanny, but was fired by her employer, Sister Zhang, because she was careless in her work. Before she was dismissed, the two had many quarrels. After being dismissed, Zhu returned to his hometown to recuperate for nearly a month. However, he is still indignant and worried. As a result, there was a revenge mentality. She knows that Sister Zhang has the habit of leaving her keys outside the house. After getting the key, she sneaked into the kitchen and took Zhang Jie's favorite frying pan. This pot is worth 1000 yuan, and the monitoring also recorded Zhu's crime process.

Stealing her favorite frying pan is a confusing operation. To get back at her, she took her favorite frying pan. In the end, instead of venting her anger, she got herself into more trouble, was taken away by the police for investigation, and was taken into compulsory measures on suspicion of theft. According to the relevant laws and regulations, the police will accept the theft alarm and investigate. Generally, a criminal case will be filed only when the amount of theft reaches a certain amount. In Zhejiang, the theft amount of 3000 yuan belongs to a large amount.

Under normal circumstances, stealing 1,000 yuan is not serious enough to be punished by criminal law, but this case is a burglary case, and there is no requirement for the amount of theft. It is worth noting that in this case, Zhu was worried about his experience as a nanny at home and waited for revenge. Then, there are different views on whether the act of taking the pot belongs to theft.

Dramatic legal issues Some people think that Zhu does not constitute theft. The purpose of illegal possession of other people's property in theft is not simply to transfer the property, but to actively use it after taking it away. After all, theft is essentially a crime against property. If Zhu took Pan just because he thought it would make people suffer, it should not be regarded as illegal possession. So it does not constitute theft.

There is also a view that Zhu constitutes theft, and the purpose of illegal possession in theft refers to excluding others' possession. In the case that everyone loses control of property, theft has been established.