A man in Xuanwei died after drinking, and seven people at the same table were accused of going to court. The organizer needs to bear the responsibility of safety attention, and the other six people do not need to bear legal responsibility. There are seven people drinking together, and the person who organized the banquet needs to bear the responsibility of safety care and compensate 70 thousand yuan. The two sides have reached a settlement. Partners who drink together at the dinner table need to judge whether they should bear the responsibility according to whether they have over-advised alcohol. Because the man's family can't prove to the court that his companion has persuaded him to drink, the man should bear the main responsibility and the organizer should bear the secondary responsibility. A partner who drinks at the same table does not need to bear legal responsibility.

First, because the family did not agree to the autopsy, the family could not provide the real cause of death of the man.

Some people may have physical diseases and are not suitable for drinking a lot. Especially heart patients, who die after drinking, need to bear the main responsibility independently. The man died after drinking alcohol, and it cannot be ruled out whether it was a physical cause. Because the family did not agree to the autopsy, it was impossible to prove that the man died of excessive drinking, and the law ruled that the man should bear the main responsibility.

Second, the organizer needs to bear the responsibility of safety attention and compensate 70,000 yuan.

In this incident, the boss who organized employees to drink should take good care of every guest at the table. As long as the guest has an accident after drinking, the host will bear the corresponding legal responsibility. The court ruled that the owner of the car should bear secondary responsibility and should also bear the loss of 70 thousand yuan from the man's death to make up for the loss of the man's family. ?

Third, the deskmate has no vomiting behavior on the wine table and does not need to take responsibility.

People who eat at the same table can prove to each other that there is no persuasion on the wine table. They went home after dinner, and there was nothing unusual about that person before they went home. These companions also have no motive to hurt men, so they don't need to bear legal responsibility. ?

So, how do you think we should refuse others to persuade us to drink at the wine table?