Although I understand that these people just want to make a living by talking about these things, I should expose them.
Absurd 1, the lecturer himself failed.
I didn't even succeed, so I don't talk about success.
Anyone who tells you success without successful experience is essentially a liar.
Absurd 2. The lecturer's past is all made up.
No one knows his past, and he can't find it if he wants to search. He can cover this up for you in the name of a low-key entrepreneur, such as making a fortune silently.
Luxury villas can be rented, and he can write his extraordinary history in this fake form.
As long as fools believe, their purpose has been achieved.
Absurd 3. Just to sell classes.
They just want to sell their class and use the public's desire for status and wealth to make some perfunctory mouths. No matter how reasonable what he said, he was inspired by many things, and today is over. You are still you, and he is still him.
Next, I will talk about some basic logic that simply doesn't hold water.
Basic logic 1, no practical application conditions.
I compare success with recipes, the same ingredients, the same raw materials, the same cooking methods, and the final result will be more or less different for everyone.
The same is true of success. Even if you are born with the ability, financial resources, resources, contacts and appropriate methods, you may not succeed.
What's more, career success is not the same as cooking, and the preparations and preconditions that need to be made are much more demanding. Before applying successful methods, most people were unable to obtain such "raw materials" and "ingredients".
They have good ideas, good ideas and good methods. But no matter how good and reasonable it is, it will not be of much use to those who have no ability to implement it.
To put it simply, if I have money and resources, do I still need to listen to you here?
Basic logic II. Success requires practical experience.
Those who succeed in the end are not obtained by summing up countless hardships and many failures.
It is not just a conversation between one person and a group of people, you will immediately have the experience and ability of others.
It needs a process of formation. Many people must have felt it, too. Every time I hear these successful chicken soup, I feel super reasonable at first, which seems very enlightening. After a sleep, I forgot all about it.
Experience after personal experience has real practical value.
Any language other than your actual experience will not have any practical influence on you, it can only exist as an inspirational story.
Basic logic 3. Doing great things mainly depends on understanding.
Want to achieve great things, not simply by knowledge or skill, mainly by understanding.
The reason why most people can't do anything important is their poor understanding.
Those great entrepreneurs, not super smart, are naturally good at thinking and summing up.
Ordinary people have average IQ and understanding, let alone being taught by lecturers. Even if Buffett and Ma Yun teach together, he can't do great things.
Basic logic 4. Success cannot be repeated.
Success is very accidental, not inevitable. Success, like history, cannot be repeated. Coincidentally, anyone can succeed. Even if the law of development is found, it is still impossible to accurately predict the future.
One Baba succeeded. You just create a B Baba according to the historical development process of A Baba, which is of little practical significance.
X-rays and X-rays, the most reproducible, failed in the end.
The bosses failed. Do you think you can do it arrogantly?
Its 1, we are not competitive.
Alibaba, these big names, has gained a firm foothold in the market. You are not competitive at all.
Second, you can never keep up.
Alibaba is still innovating. Even if you have innovative ideas, people will catch up quickly, and you will always be a big step behind.
If these bosses are no longer innovative, it is just like Nokia did not make progress in those years, and was later overtaken by Apple and forced to go bankrupt.