Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Complete cookbook - What are the six criteria for winning the battle?
What are the six criteria for winning the battle?
The standard is no, that is, flexible use of all resources in your hands is the basis of victory.

Brave and good at fighting are consumed in storming, defending and crowded teams, which is stupid and ridiculous.

Modern warfare recognizes the need to consume more ammunition, not too much effective force.

Because there will be more ammunition in the later period of the war, people who are good at using it will die. If weapons and ammunition fall into the hands of the enemy, they will kill their own people and help them kill their own people.

Make full use of the leverage principle and the breakthrough of the third line, highlight the speed of surprise attack and the panic of sudden attack, and break the enemy's will when the enemy is in chaos.

I have seen an old movie, in which the company commander in Shangganling bombed the bunker, and every night there was a tin box, and the US military fired a gun. Throw it to the American army and fall asleep. If you don't shoot, the bunker will explode. This is cleverness.

With the intuitive understanding of soldiers, it must be a big charge, but also cover, sacrifice, bloody battle. In the end, dozens of people were killed or injured before blowing up a bunker. This is stupid.

Saying this is far from what you want to know.

Those who can't run in battle are already heroes. The first time they saw their comrades fall down without peeing their pants, it was the standard of winning the battle.

Soldiers should train more, stay in foxholes, shoot and explode everywhere, and feel the environment, not empty guns with embroidered pillows. He died. No, you died first.

The weakness of the PLA is that people are too dense, and people charge every 50 meters.

If every soldier has a night vision device, communicator, thermal camera, optical aiming distance and bulletproof vest. Casualties will definitely be reduced by more than half.

The value of these equipments alone is several million. It is not for soldiers to choose which price China can afford in future wars.