Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Complete cookbook - 0.2 million/200 thousand Jin pheasant, the worst plan is harmless treatment. What impact will this have on farmers and restaurants?
0.2 million/200 thousand Jin pheasant, the worst plan is harmless treatment. What impact will this have on farmers and restaurants?
The first impact is definitely the economy, and the impact of restaurants is the cause of the epidemic, which has little to do with whether frogs can eat. Moreover, there will definitely be a wave of retaliatory consumption after stabilization, which will basically have no impact. Specifically do the following analysis:

1.200,000 Jin of frog is only a small part of the national farmers. The whole country is at least 1 100 million Jin, and the direct loss is based on the whole country, starting with 654.38+0 billion.

Frog farming accounts for the highest proportion in wildlife farming, second only to soft-shelled turtle. The weight of frogs eaten in China every year should be several hundred million Jin, that is, 14 yuan/Jin * 1 100 million Jin =1400 million yuan. This is only the agricultural price, and the price is already relatively low. If it is the market price, it should be around 18 yuan/kg, and the restaurant price is sold to 32 yuan/kg. Therefore, once calculated, there are definitely billions, and this loss will actually pit every farmer.

If restaurants and vendors just smash the goods in their hands, then all farmers will lose their blood, and they will also lose investment in disinfection drugs, site construction, oxygen supply machines, purse seines and so on. Even if the labor cost is not counted, farmers will definitely lose more than 60 thousand if they farm one mu of land, except frogs.

Second, if the harmless treatment plan is really launched, farmers will reject the previous policy propaganda and some poverty alleviation projects.

The reason why farmers can breed all kinds of wild animals and get breeding licenses is not because they blindly invest in themselves, but because they respond to previous policies. Specific examples are:

Five years ago, City A thought it was time to develop a project as a pillar industry, and then after considering many industries, it chose frog breeding. Then there are five counties in city A, and after investigation in several counties, it is decided that county B will carry out frog breeding poverty alleviation projects; During the implementation period, county B found seed selection experts, seedling experts, frog breeding experts, aquatic epidemic prevention personnel, poverty alleviation civil servants and so on. And it took three years to promote the project of raising frogs to fellow villagers until 5000 pairs of 65438+100000 households in the county chose to raise frogs.

After the implementation, from the county level to the municipal level, we began to find channels to promote the sales of frogs; Civil servants are following some hotels? Mention something? , in the network with other e-commerce? Sales? On some video platforms, the menu related to frogs was wildly screened, so a breeding product was pushed to greedy cats and then sold through various channels. In the meantime, we even taught some vendors around the world how to kill and chop frogs, and let some ignorant home cooking experts learn this kind of food.

The implementation of such a policy, which usually takes five years as the deadline, was once banned, and the efforts of countless people hit Shui Piao! Only a few people have seen these hard-working farmers, and most people will question what to raise next time if they are banned.

Third, the impact of catering will not be too great, but the quarantine and procurement channels need to be strengthened.

There is nothing wrong with the catering industry. At most, there is one menu missing, and you can make it up slowly in the future, as long as you don't hang up. Games? Our stores will basically not be affected, because businesses that reopen now can basically receive orders for retaliatory consumption. It may be a little bitter in 2020, and those who have no foreign debts can survive.

Generally speaking, whether frogs can be farmed is only a proposal, and there is no explicit prohibition; Some leaders in some areas want to improve their political achievements? One size fits all? Settle accounts after autumn.

Farmers should not be impulsive. Under the current legal situation, do not do excessive acts (direct harmless treatment, smashing the site, destroying your own breeding equipment, etc.). ). There is a high probability that it will not be banned, waiting for the policy to be finalized.