A wonderful action movie doesn't need any elaborate plot at all, as long as the relationship between characters and the accumulation of feelings are relatively smooth. The first episode is very clear, and the second episode is a bit like paste in this respect. Watching action movies can generally ignore the plot, but when the stiffness of the plot affects the mood of watching action, it is worth picking out criticism. However, these bad plots are nothing compared with Fallon Ye Yun's extraordinary behavior! For a long time, I have been thinking, what is the difference between Fallon Ye Yun and Jackie Chan? From a big perspective, both of them are good at prancing and jumping, brave in doing adventure stunts, coherent in action and strong in rhythm. In order to seek the truth, I used almost all the DVDs of Jackie Chan's old movies to browse the action scenes, and found that Jackie Chan's action was "light" and Xiaoyun's action was "fast". Although they all mean "fast", Jackie Chan's style is a little "small and flexible", while Xiaoyun's seems to pay more attention to the intensity of attack. Maybe it has something to do with the setting of the role image. Jackie Chan's role is rarely "positive". His attack on the enemy has always been "flexible", so the "process" of finding air strikes, creating obstacles and launching counterattacks in dodge is the focus of the performance. Xiaoyun's role is more inclined to Bruce Lee, that is, the type that never retreats and goes forward bravely. But he lacks Bruce Lee's "domineering" temperament, so he belongs to "nobody" in the psychological type of the role. "Super fierce" and "nobody", what is that like? That is the "Di Yun" type of Liancheng. Therefore, although Xiaoyun's movements are clever, they lack the demeanor of a master, but those without fancy movements are much more "solid" than Jackie Chan's, just as honest farmers are much more simple than small gangsters in the village. ?