Law and Morality The so-called legal belief is people's infinite conviction and worship of the law, and regards it as the highest criterion of behavior. "The generation of a public's belief in law is very important, and it is a key element of a country's rule of law. Because of this, Boehlmann's wise saying "Law must be believed, otherwise it will be useless" will be widely circulated and become a truth principle that all people who advocate the rule of law believe. [2] "Legal belief is people's recognition and submission to the law, and its essence is the pursuit of legal supremacy and legal rule. Only by believing in the law can we abide by it. As a symbol of fairness and justice, law-abiding is only the external manifestation of legal belief, and the spirit of law-abiding is the soul of legal belief. The spirit of abiding by the law requires the subject not only to abide by the law, but more importantly, to internalize the law-abiding into a moral responsibility and obligation, and to change the forced law-abiding into voluntary law-abiding, from compulsory law-abiding to conscientious law-abiding, and from heteronomy to self-discipline.

Looking at the development history of human society, the more democratic and orderly the society, the stronger the citizens' respect and demand for law in this social scene. The reason why these citizens pursue the supremacy of law (rules) is that they are used to trusting legal rules; The more important e-commerce database is that they have the conditions to ensure the maximization of their rights and the concretization of government power control through legal rules. This is because "the rule of law is a universal, stable and clear social norm, and it is a kind of public authority, not personality authority, privilege majesty and family affection. In adjusting the development of society to a high level, it can automatically eliminate or resist the infringement of contingency, arbitrariness and privilege, so that society can form a highly stable and orderly order and state in a strictly standardized and institutionalized benign movement; Secondly, in terms of people's living arrangements, legal rules require a tacit understanding between individuals, between individuals and governments and organizations, and a mechanism of self-regulation. This kind of "tacit understanding" and "regulation mechanism" can promote a high degree of harmony in human life, maximize the protection of people's freedom and dignity, and give people absolute power, regardless of class or country, and design a free and caring life model. [3] Therefore, to improve the overall legal literacy of a country's citizens, we should start from two aspects: one is to teach citizens legal knowledge and cultivate their legal awareness and even legal beliefs; The second is to vigorously promote the process of social democratization and rule of law. Undoubtedly, as an institution of higher learning that educates people by nature, it is its unshirkable duty to take part in the process of social modernization and shape "modern talents" by leading and rapidly improving the legal literacy of young students. However, in recent years, the rising crime data of college students frequently tells us that the campus is not calm and the legal literacy of college students is still very poor. Comrade Wu Yunnan from Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Justice made a survey of 49 colleges and universities in Guangdong Province, and the results were shocking. From 1981 to 1998, there were 626 students who had violated the law and committed crimes in these 49 colleges and universities, accounting for about two-thirds of the total number of students in the same period. Two civil servants from the Personnel and Labor Security Bureau of Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province were assassinated in the office on the afternoon of April 3, 2113. The police confirmed that the suspect was 22 years old on Monday and was a fresh graduate of the Department of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University. It turned out that he had passed the written examination and interview in the open recruitment of civil servants in the district, but his health examination failed and he was not hired. Because of pessimism, I had the idea of revenge, so I was angry with the recruiters in the personnel department, which eventually led to murder. On March 28th, 2113, the first college student crime prevention center in China was established in Pukou District Procuratorate of Nanjing, and Nanjing University, Southeast University and other 11 universities in Nanjing became the first members of the center. The reason for establishing this "College Students Crime Prevention Center" is that through investigation and analysis, it is found that the crime rate of college students in this area increased by 311% in 2111 and by 1.21% in 2112 compared with 2111, and it is also concluded that most of the crimes committed by college students are due to ignorance of the law.

in the face of these shocking data of college students' crimes, a more appropriate explanation can be given: the current "legal education" course in schools has not really made students understand the law at all. As Liu Haiyang (a student in Tsinghua University), the party involved in the case of "sulfuric acid hurting a bear", said: "We studied the course of" Basic Law "in our freshman year, and studied civil law and criminal law, but I only know that it is illegal to kill wild animals, but it is not clear whether it is illegal to burn animals in the zoo with reagents. From this heart-to-heart, we may get more enlightenments than the" incident "itself, and the legal education model in colleges and universities in China must be changed. The cognitive orientation of legal and moral legal education should be changed. According to the spirit and practice of official documents in China, the "legal education" in schools is subordinate to "moral education" and has no independent status of its own. The understanding and orientation of "legal education" second to "moral education" is not reasonable. It is not only difficult to achieve the educational nature of legal education, but also will make "legal education" be buried. It is precisely because of this unreasonable understanding that for a long time, it has been difficult to see independent law teaching and research sections in institutions of higher learning, large and small, and it has been replaced by the same moral education teaching and research sections. As a result, it is difficult to carry out legal education.

Both moral education and legal education belong to the category of social value education. They have both differences and connections. In terms of connection, they have the same purpose, both of which are to cultivate "qualified citizens" suitable for social needs. Differentially speaking, moral education focuses on purifying people's inner world, while legal education focuses on regulating people's external behavior. We say that improving people's quality should be shaped from two aspects: thought and behavior, which is beneficial to the combination of legal education and moral education, but there is no question that legal education is subordinate to moral education or moral education is subordinate to legal education. Therefore, the educational play of legal education needs to construct a legal education arrangement with complete system and independent status. The teaching staff of legal education should be optimized. Legal education is a comprehensive education that is political, theoretical, knowledgeable and practical. It should not only have clear objectives, standardized contents and relatively stable educational channels, but also have a team of law teachers with formal training, certain theoretical level and practical experience. At present, many of the so-called "law teachers" are "half-way monks" or even political cadres who have never received legal education. It is conceivable how much legal literacy the "disciples" who have been "baked" in this situation will have. Law teachers in colleges and universities should not only be well versed in the laws of school education and the growth of young students, but also have systematic knowledge of legal subjects and high legal quality. Different schools should, according to their own conditions, form a capable full-time teacher with a considerable level through various forms such as full-time, part-time and employment, and at the same time hire some part-time teachers who have been engaged in judicial practice or legal education for a long time as a supplement to form an authentic and high-quality legal education teacher team. Third, the content of legal education should be adjusted. The "legal education" in colleges and universities is to cultivate college students' legal consciousness (legal belief) and legal knowledge (legal skills), which should mainly include the basic theory of law, basic legal knowledge and legal concept education. Through legal theory education, students can master the basic viewpoints of Marxist law and establish legal authority ideologically; It is necessary to explain and introduce the Constitution, so that students can understand that the Constitution is the product of a democratic system, help students to establish a correct concept of rights and obligations, and establish a sense of national ownership; Combined with different majors, some departmental laws are selectively introduced to students, so as to cultivate students' knowledge, skills and consciousness of obeying the law, protecting the law and using it.

At present, all colleges and universities in different categories are forced to offer a course "Basic Law" to cope with "Legal Education". Because of the lack of class hours and numerous contents, the professors are just skimming the surface and rushing to make progress, and can only simply list and accumulate a series of knowledge; Learners, often tired of coping, rote learning, coping with passing the exam, teachers and students are miserable. This is obviously contrary to the real purpose of "legal education". On the content selection of legal education, it is more appropriate to offer legal education courses at different levels in different types of schools. According to the type of school the students are in and the special e-commerce database they have studied: 57: 4%2! ! ; *; ) "The key needs of colleges and universities, in addition to the general popularization of the Constitution, criminal law, civil law and other laws, also set up some legal courses related to the majors (industries) of colleges and universities and connected with all kinds of students' recipients, so that" legal education "is close to the life of college students and integrated into their inherent needs. Fourth, the implementation of legal education should be improved. Legal education in colleges and universities should first follow the unique laws of legal education. Legal education is the education of "recognizing" norms, "accepting" norms and "digesting" norms, and it is the education of cultivating conscious and voluntary law-abiding spirit and shaping modern concepts of rule of law, such as democracy, justice, efficiency and fairness. In fact, it is very difficult to rely on the traditional boring "classroom preaching". It is more suitable for students to feel how to abide by these norms in vivid and intuitive practical activities.