I don't agree.

1. There is no law that the inheritance of the Dinks must be given to collateral relatives, or they can make a will and donate it to the society.

2. Dink's original intention is to be responsible for his own life and for the children who have not appeared. As for the aftermath, it doesn't matter who the property is given to. People are dead, and it makes no difference to anyone who gives those foreign objects.

I am Dink myself. My husband put it forward at first. After careful consideration, I think it makes sense. Besides, the old people on both sides agreed, so I decided to Dink. The reason why we chose Dink: First, neither of our genes is particularly good. He has hereditary hypertension. Although I have nothing serious wrong with it, I have been weak since childhood, and I often have colds and fever. We both agree that genes like ours do not have to be passed down, and children will suffer at that time. Another thing is that we think we can't be good parents. Neither of us is patient and may not be able to educate our children well. Based on this initial intention, I don't think the ownership of things outside our bodies has any influence on us, as long as we have enough when we are alive. And if I really have a lot of property when I leave this world, I will probably consider donating most of it and leaving a small part to my relatives and friends who help me. In fact, giving someone too much money may hurt him.

There are many people in the Dink family who regret to death. When they are fifty, they want to have children again. Men divorce. Looking for a second child, that silly woman ended up alone to death. Dink's family is not so perfect

Does it matter who the inheritance is given to after death? We can't take it with us.

Qin Shihuang conquered the world and left it to his son. Didn't the son lose the world? Liu Bei left Jiangshan to his son, and Zhuge Liang passed the mantle to Jiang Wei. Didn't they just lose Jiangshan? Children and grandchildren have their own children and grandchildren. It's his destiny. He can succeed on his own. He is not that fate. No matter how much you leave him, he can spend it all.

even if our son is successful in my official career with our inheritance, what should I do if he is not filial to you? What is the difference between a child who is not filial to you and Dink? Buddhism says well that color is empty and color is color.

However, whether Dink is or not depends on everyone's thoughts. It is not recommended that everyone go to Dink. Someone has to breed species.

it's good to have a baby. According to Christianity, people are born with suffering, and they will be busy all their lives and suffer all their hardships. From birth, school, work, having children, getting old, and finally dust to dust. All species, including humans, are tool people. Some animals live for seven days just to mate and reproduce. Although it is painful to have children, we have no choice. This is the nature given to every species by nature.

Many people dink not because they are afraid of pain, or because they think their children are troublesome. But that they have no desire to have children. Just like some people don't like smoking, some people don't like women, some people don't drink, and some people don't eat or drink well. Everyone's personality is different, which determines their views and thoughts on the world. You can't force it. Just be yourself.

Wang Jianlin has a son, and Wang Jianlin is a very responsible father, and he has spared no effort to start his son's business. But in the end? Didn't Wang Jianlin squander his unintentional venture capital for his son? Up to now, there has also been news that the Beijing court has proposed to limit high consumption. Let's talk about it. Even if we have children, we meet a child who doesn't know how to operate and manage, and a child who doesn't know how to care and appreciate. As parents, it's really better not to have this child who keeps making trouble all the time. Therefore, I said that the money earned by the Dink family and the couple may not necessarily be given to you, and the property of outsiders may not necessarily be left to you. I think, but all Dink families have a set of ways and strategies for the couple to live, so don't worry about other people's money when it comes to collateral relatives.

I think those Dink families who are stimulated to put forward that they don't want children usually plan their life well at what stage, unlike those who want children, but can't have them because of their health or other reasons. Such people always feel insecure and always look forward to having a child, but it never comes true. Such childless families generally want to adopt a child from their brothers and sisters or some immediate family members, or agree who to give their property to in the future, and then the child will take care of themselves. Only in this case will money be given to immediate family members, but don't worry about collateral relatives.

inheritance law, the first priority, parents, partners and children. Second in line, brothers and sisters, grandparents. Everyone in the pecking order has equal inheritance rights. What nonsense is collateral inheritance? Don't tell me a will. If I were Dink, I wouldn't leave a will to my relatives. If there is no deep feeling in the second place, I will also leave a will to deprive them of their inheritance and leave it to the country, the society and those in need, so as not to waste my life.

where did the only child come from? [Picking nose] My husband and I are Dink, and we signed a body donation agreement. When the couple are gone, if there is any legacy, we will donate it to the families of martyrs who died for the country [Yi tooth ]

First of all, I agree with this sentence, because after Dink, do you have any descendants? No matter how much property you earn, will anyone inherit it when you die? According to the law, who is it for? If I didn't make a will before my death, I'd have to give it to my relatives.

I'm Dink, too. If I leave a will, it must be someone who can take care of my property, regardless of relatives and outsiders.

How much property do you have that you need someone to inherit?

for most ordinary people, if Dink, no one will accuse you of selling your house when you are old and traveling without leaving it to your children, and your children will not blame you for being selfish, and your children will not care about how much property you have there, so as not to provide for your old age and coerce you to give him the property that should have belonged to him earlier. Will you give it or not?

For the average person, it is not enough for you to slowly travel around the great rivers and mountains of the motherland after retirement, let alone travel around the world, take a cruise, stay in a better castle hotel and eat delicious food from other countries. If you have no children, you can really enjoy the world, and finally just leave a little money for old-age care. People are really too old to get up in bed and need someone to carry excrement and urine, that is, one or two years. Many rural elderly people are over 89 years old and can still work in the fields. Once they can't get up, they are not far from death. What's more, young people and middle-aged people have to go to work now. Where is the time to accompany you to bring you shit, urine, tea and water one day? Why don't you just invite a nanny?

this is for the average person, and money can certainly be used up. Unless those super-rich people, such as Jack Ma and Li Ka-shing, can't run out of money no matter how profligate he is, and there will definitely be a lot of money left, then he may consider that if he doesn't give it to his children, he may only leave it to other relatives. Ordinary people, you really worry too much. Now many elderly people want to go out for a trip when they are old and sell their houses. They will be scolded by their children for being selfish. They think that they should leave the house to him and let him struggle less for ten years, but they only care about their own enjoyment and disregard their children. They think that you will not give me the house, take care of my children and take care of my daughter-in-law. Then don't blame me for not giving you old-age care in the future. Where can the old man who has worked hard to use his accumulated property all his life argue? It is also said that this is the national condition and tradition of China.

I don't know about Ke Ding, but there is an old bachelor in the company, and everyone knows that he has no relatives or reasons. Everyone in the unit takes special care of him, and he is very kind. The unit gave you a single room at the last time of housing distribution. After he retired, all the units took care of him. After his death, the unit finished the funeral. I didn't expect his nephew to come and take all his property and house. To tell the truth, it is reasonable for the law and unreasonable for the feelings. Whether collateral or direct, you don't have this person in your heart at all. What qualifications do you have to inherit? I didn't know he had a nephew for decades.