Stearns said in "World Civilization": "The Tang Dynasty established an empire much larger than the previous Han Dynasty, and its territory far exceeded the area of China today." It can be seen that some foreign historians are more concerned about territory. What we are talking about now is the prosperous period of Han and Tang dynasties, which is more about the vast territory and large population, and even the amount of national fiscal revenue, rather than the improvement of people's lives. Zhumen stinks of wine and meat, and the road has frozen bones! This is still a phenomenon in the prosperous Tang Dynasty. This is not right! At least, I think so. Only when the people live a rich life can the country become strong. The country is strong, and the people have two tendons around their necks. Is it useful?
Hitoshi Hitoshi, Japan: "The law of the Tang Dynasty in the seventh century is worse than the holy Roman Empire in the sixteenth century, and it can also be compared with the law of morality in the seventeenth century." After the reform of Dahua in Japan, the laws adopted were similar to those of Zhenguan in Tang Dynasty. In other words, Japan has learned the laws and regulations of China, which is very good. At that time, Japan followed China's footsteps and followed suit!
Siberian Notes: "China people who send gold, silver, millet and silk always like to use flattery. They use flattery and wealth to lure ethnic groups living in distant areas and bring them closer. " This is a process of economic and cultural output, in order to better publicize the profoundness of Central Plains culture to other countries.
These people are only a small part of the evaluation. As for more content, check it online yourself! Do you like the Tang Dynasty? What do you think of the comparison between the Song Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty?