The advantages of face-to-face are intuitive expression, clear tone and realism.
But its shortcomings are also obvious, because for some reason, it does not express what it wants to express; Can't reflect unexpected problems in time; Your own ideas are easily influenced by others and you can't get a correct judgment.
In the face of important problems, the advantages of face-to-face are not enough to make up for their own disadvantages, especially for those who are not skilled in language expression and immature in ideological system.
Once one of Lincoln's subordinates complained to him about all kinds of things. Lincoln said, go back and write it down and hand it over to your desk tomorrow. As a result, the man didn't hand in anything the next day, because in the process of writing, he cleared his mind and understood that there was no need to complain about many things.
That's what I want to say. In the face of important issues, written communication is definitely better than face-to-face communication.
In the process of writing, what we want to say is completely sufficient and will not be interrupted by anyone; Our views are continuous and will not change because other views come out. These two points are very important, which directly leads to whether the expression is completely sufficient.
A complete and sufficient expression is also important to the other side of communication; Give each other enough time to reflect. In this way, is it also good for the theme of communication?
I'm talking about a person's opinion, please consider it.