Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Healthy recipes - How did Simba respond to the bird's nest incident?
How did Simba respond to the bird's nest incident?
Simba first apologized for this matter, and then gave a response to the fake storm, saying that Xinxuan proposed to pay first and recalled all the sales in Xinxuan's live broadcast room? Hey? Brand of bird's nest products, and bear the responsibility of returning one and losing three. This matter has come to an end.

Before that, Simba had responded to the bird's nest incident. At that time, he filmed a video in which he took the opened bird's nest and poured it into a cup with a filter. The filter was full of what Simba called bird's nest. And while shooting, he said it was not false propaganda, saying that someone maliciously discredited their team. However, with more and more customers responding to the quality problems of bird's nest, they said that they would be investigated for legal responsibility, even if they were sued for bankruptcy, they would be prosecuted to the end.

But things are far more than that. After the storm ended, the counterfeiter Wang Hai broke the news, saying that the sugar water content in the test report of bird's nest exceeded 90%, and the counterfeiter Wang Hai said that the cost of the bird's nest was less than 1 yuan. Simba was sent to the hot search again at once, until it was commented by CCTV, and it was not until 1 1 27 that a reply was made on this matter. First of all, it was said that bird's nest did contain sialic acid, even if the content was very small, and secondly, it was explained that it was only responsible for live broadcast with goods, and the commission charged was only a few to dozens. Everyone made taobao guest understand this point, and finally apologized for after-sales service and was willing to negotiate a return. It can be said that it is full of twists and turns.

In fact, the focus of this incident is not on bird's nest fraud, but under the trend of modern anchors bringing goods, many anchors have adopted exaggerated methods to falsely publicize the characteristics of products in order to attract customers' attention. The quality of the products sold was not screened, which harmed the rights and interests of consumers. If CCTV had not commented, perhaps this matter would have ended in vain. The major anchors will not take this matter to heart.

Finally, I also hope that in the era of Internet shopping, we will shop carefully, look at the quality, and don't be greedy and cheap.