Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Dietary recipes - In competitive games, is "frying fish" a law of the jungle or a moral issue?
In competitive games, is "frying fish" a law of the jungle or a moral issue?
I think the meaning of the word fried fish is self-evident. We have all played the game of eat small fish, the big fish. The segmentation of the game is like one watershed after another, where different fish live.

So when some "big fish" migrated to the original fish pond, what he got was a sense of superiority in abusing vegetables, which affected the game experience of one player after another.

So what is the law of the jungle? There is something that will stimulate you to become better and more "hungry". Fish-frying is not. It's a unilateral hanging, and there is no incentive at all, because the game has different meanings for different players. Some people enjoy the fun brought by the game, some people want to make the game a tool for themselves to pass the time or temporarily stay away from the real world, while others want to win.

But no matter what kind of player, frying fish is purely immoral, because it greatly affects the game experience of other players, and they may get a little bit of fun, but holding the points on their thighs has nothing to do with themselves, and it is meaningless and meaningless.

Just like my favorite basketball, without teamwork, five people are like playing with four people. Even if they win, they will be boring and even tired, even if their strength is too different. Team basketball and even matches, whether offensive efficiency or ornamental, are all above this.

I hope my answer can help you!