It depends on how you say it, everyone has different positions and they come to different conclusions.

But I still hope that everyone can make a true and objective comparison in person instead of drawing their own conclusions under the misleading of others.

Our comments are for informational purposes only.

1. Leica is a camera aristocrat. It relies on its own understanding and management of color to give photos a more artistic flavor.

Because the biggest feature of Leica is the color matching, Huawei that introduces Leica is better than motorcycles that introduce Hasselblad.

Nokia's introduction of Zeiss will be much more successful, because the performance of mobile phones continues to improve, but color management will never change. People who like Leica like the flavor of Leica, not the Leica lens. Of course, Leica also has its own preferences for its own lenses.

standard.

2. If you compare only in terms of parameters, Leica does not have an advantage. The parameters are much better than it. However, in the field of cameras, Leica’s status is at the same level as Zeiss, much higher than Canon and Nikon, let alone

Let’s talk about Sony at a lower level.

Everyone must be wondering, why are the photosensitive components made by Sony, but Sony is worse than Canon, and Canon is worse than Leica?

But the fact is that it is true. You can ask senior photography enthusiasts for advice, and they all know that what Leica relies on is not the hardware, but the rich feeling.

When it comes to lenses, Zeiss is the best, and Hasselblad is the most powerful in terms of technology. Hasselblad makes astronomical telescopes.

3. Just talk without practicing the posture.

I don’t know how to take pictures of people and sceneries, but when it comes to taking pictures of food, my P10 beats countless powerful phones in seconds.

Everyone said that although the photos taken by the P10 were unrealistic, they made people more appetizing after watching them.