In fact, I have to say that the killing of live cats in a market has caused social controversy. On the one hand, cats as pets are closely related to people's lives, and it is precisely because of this scene of killing live cats that people are really a little uncomfortable. The netizen crowdfunding 7000 is also to protect small animals, but it must be said that killing live cats does not constitute a crime, but at present, in the process of operating the environment, there is a lack of necessary safety procedures. Therefore, killing cats does not comply with relevant procedures, so it has been rectified by relevant departments. However, we will find that the cat rescue incident itself has caused social controversy, and we can think about the problem from the following aspects.

1, for us, although being with cats is special and has become the pet of most human beings, whether we can eat cat meat is also a social dispute. In fact, we have to say that we will find that social books say that my cat has entered the homes of ordinary people, and it is precisely because of this that it is closely related to human life. But for us, whether we can eat cat meat is also controversial. On the one hand, the cat's identity is really special, and it is very close to human life. On the other hand, people should have the freedom to eat and drink, so it is precisely because of this that whether cat meat should be banned has also aroused social concern.

2, I have to say that netizens raised 7000 yuan to save cats, which is also caring for small animals, but for us, we can care for animals, but we should not interfere with other people's diet problems. In fact, it has to be said that netizens' crowdfunding to save cats has aroused social concern and made people realize the importance of protecting small animals. Most people have the freedom to eat. It is precisely because of this that cats are not legally fasted animals, so in a sense, people also have the freedom to eat cat meat, so protectors should not occupy the moral high ground and condemn people who eat cat meat. For us, the market kills cats to meet the consumption needs of some people, so

There is no contradiction between eating cat meat and protecting small animals. It is precisely because of this that we can have the freedom to protect cats on the one hand and understand those who eat cat meat on the other. In fact, I have to say that people in the society often think that cats are cute, so why should they eat cat meat? They occupy the moral high ground and condemn those who slaughter live cats to eat cat meat. But in a sense, cat meat is not listed as a fasting animal in law, and it is precisely because of this that human beings have the freedom to eat cat meat. If they interfere in other people's lives too much and constantly condemn others with morality, then this kind of behavior itself is extremely controversial.

In fact, I have to say that the procedures for killing cats on the market are not complete, so it has been clearly rectified by the relevant departments. On the other hand, whether cats should eat is controversial. On the one hand, cat lovers think cats are too cute to be food. On the other hand, human beings have the freedom to eat and drink and should be treated rationally.