This problem is mainly caused by not knowing what the nutritional value is. As we all know, the cheaper something is, the more valuable it is, and the more expensive it is, the less valuable it is. Nutrition actually refers to the combustion value, that is, how many joules and heat can be released when a substance of the same mass is burned. Because joule is a very small and fine unit, if you mark a watch with joule, it is easy to count too many zeros, so it is expressed in calories and calories.
One thousand calories equals one calorie. One thousand calories equals 4. 18 kilojoules. One calorie is equal to 4. 18 kilojoules. So you say which egg is more nutritious and has more added value. These are two questions. If there is nutrition, you take these eggs of the same quality for burning test to see which one releases more calories. This is often related to quality, but the tests done under the condition of equal weight are generally similar, so this is only related to quality, that is, eating more will lead to nutrition, and eating less will lead to less nutrition.
If the value is added, the value of the same nutrition is not great. Therefore, when you spend a lot of money to buy this product that you think is slightly nutritious, its cost performance drops, and it becomes nutritious and worthless. On the contrary, nutrition is almost the lowest price and more valuable. So the burning value of these eggs is similar. Which one is worthless and which one is the cheapest is the most valuable. But this fuel value is meaningless after all.
Because protein is not made for burning, different protein will have different states and functions, so it is put on the biological level. Don't talk about nutrition and value, just talk about function. Therefore, nutritious things are worthless when they are expensive, and it is meaningless to talk about the burning value of functional things. So western nutrition, like their language, is also called Angke, including uncles, cousins, uncles, cousins, and men without relatives and friends.
They are all called Angke, but we know that there are completely different kinship and connection behind these names, but they must be separated. So the word nutrition is too general. The theory of using fuel value to express grades has no nutrition in itself. With the progress of biological science, the understanding of the functional properties of various grazing materials may have greater value and more meaningful role.
Therefore, it is biased that food talks about nutrition and function talks about nutrition. Don't say what kind of nutrition you like, just say how to eat well, because this theory itself is very limited, and it is meaningless to use which coal is better for food and functional diet. Therefore, Chinese dietotherapy never talks about burning large calories, only about function, meridian tropism and performance. Cold, hot, cool, ups and downs.