First, there is an accurate mind to kill someone;

second, counting and planning for this is to figure out how to kill each other, including making others kill (such as killing with a knife).

third, there is indeed an action to kill each other, and it is accurate to kill each other. If you want to kill A, but you kill B by mistake, it's not breaking the precept of killing.

fourth: there is joy after killing each other, that is, there is an obvious or not obvious pleasure or pleasure.

But if you kill a living thing, there will be some crimes, unless you kill it unintentionally and unintentionally.

"Catch the cicada and eat it". If you catch it yourself, kill it and eat it, it will definitely be a crime of killing.

If someone else catches you, if you kill and eat it, it's also the same as before.

If someone else catches you and kills you, and it's for you, or if you see the monkey and eat it when it dies, that's the crime of killing.

if someone else catches you and kills you, and you eat it without participating, seeing, hearing or deliberately killing for you, it is not a crime of killing, only the fault of eating meat. (Eating Sanjing Meat)

The crime of killing is very serious. Please think twice and weigh the pros and cons of appetite and robbery.