To share with you a case where the situation is very similar:

Two months ago, the company's colleague Xiao F intends to go back to his hometown to develop, so he gave up his current job.

He is mainly responsible for the copywriting aspect of the work, for the company to publicize the transaction is also particularly critical.

He is mainly responsible for copywriting, which is crucial for the company's publicity.

So the company looked for a colleague who knew about copywriting in advance to replace his work.

The leader asked F to share the materials, methods, and insights related to copywriting with the person who replaced him.

The small F thought, teach, teach, technical things in addition to the method also need time, teach the method, the other let the newcomer to figure out their own on the line, but also for the sake of a good get together and goodbye. Otherwise, if the handover is not good, the leadership is not satisfied, the back of the friends are very difficult to make.

From the above case, and then extended to your question:

By the unit dismissed, I should I will be all the technology handed over?

Personal advice: can be handed over to the technology to hand over, so that the replacement of your work can quickly on the job on the line.

Do it so that the other person can do the job. As for the higher-order skills you learned through your work, you can choose not to hand them over. The way everyone does things, the average person is not good enough to copy, as long as the basic method to teach each other, has done a very good job.

One minute on stage, ten years of work off stage. Even if you hand over all the technical skills, instead of your people are also very difficult to quickly master, so there is no need.

Well, these are my thoughts on the subject, and I hope they inspire you.

Before answering this question, it is important to first understand and figure out the concept of what technology is. According to the relevant interpretation, technology is the solution to the problem and the method of principle, refers to the use of existing things to form new things, or change the existing things function, performance methods. Technology involves various aspects, such as finished products, processes, standards, norms, indicators, methods, and so on.

This concept may not be easy to decipher, but I simply understand that there are two categories, one is rigid technology, the other is soft technology. To this end, to give you the following suggestions.

First, rigid technology in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.

The so-called rigid technology, personal understanding of those with intellectual property rights related to technology, this kind of technology are generally clear property rights owners, that is, whether it is owned by the company or owned by individuals. If the company owns, then you have to hand over these technologies accordingly, such as published articles in the name of the unit, in the name of the unit to formulate production standards, in the name of the unit to produce products and so on. If it is clearly owned by the individual, then you can choose to pay or not according to the situation.

Second, the soft technology can be freely selected.

Most of the technology that people have mastered, or accumulated, is still soft technology as I understand it. For example, the ability to use tools, such as the ability to write, such as the ability to photograph, such as the ability to program, etc., these technologies exist in the mind of the individual, even if they want to hand over, but not necessarily able to hand over. So, for these skills oneself can be flexible to make choices.

Third, properly handle personal emotions and technology handover issues.

You were dismissed by the unit, rather than their own initiative to resign, there may be a certain degree of cloth mentality, the original unit has a certain amount of complaint psychology. But in the process of dealing with personal emotions and technical handover, must grasp the degree. Can't because of personal emotion is not good, the technology that should be handed over is not handed over. Can not just do a good job of good old man, the technology should not be handed over also handed over.

The above is purely personal opinion, welcome to discuss! I wish you all work more and more smoothly, early realization of the promotion and salary increase

By the unit dismissed with the work and technology handover?

First, the termination of the handover

Answer: Yes, the need to be the handover of the work, but such as the need to be "all" of your technology to be handed over, the specific technical handover "depth" aspects, as well as the specific handover of some of what the company has its own in line with the national policy, the company has its own national policy.

Second, the law

Article 50 of the Labor Contract Law: "The employer shall, in the termination or termination of the labor contract issued by the proof of termination or termination of the labor contract, and within fifteen days for the workers to handle the archives and the transfer of social insurance relations. The worker shall handle the handover of work in accordance with the agreement between the two parties. If the employer shall pay economic compensation to the laborer in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Law, it shall be paid at the time of the handover of work."

The dismissed employees should also be completed the corresponding handover work, if the dismissed employees refused to carry out the handover, it may also affect their next salary settlement, but hastily dismissed is to use the law to defend their rights. Dismissed employees do not want to hand over, want to understand in detail you can find local or online one-on-one communication with lawyers.

If it is the original young time, I will certainly hand over the bar! There is no previous left behind, not to say blow The things used in my position are all I came after the establishment of their own, I remember when I just joined the send and receive documents are messy stacked in the tin cupboard, as well as the reading room of the books, are all I put myself off in the office building voluntarily work overtime for more than a week to get it right; there are also a number of templates I have established for the convenience of their own daily work, all by the leadership, coworkers!

In fact, it is not unwilling to hand over, that is, young people now want to learn things are not willing to lower their stature, not ashamed to ask Yesterday, the person who took my shift, ran directly over to me and said that the director of the office said that I called me to design things to teach her ...... During the handover period, she sat in her office to play with her cell phone, but also not to my office to see how I work.

To be honest, most of my thirty years of work experience is self-taught, even if I don't understand the business process need to ask the seniors, are with a smile, playing haha, shy face with the seniors to steal from the master!

Not to mention that I, like her, have passed the written test, interviews, stuck in the physical examination of this hurdle, had no choice but to withdraw from the current job, even if her mother is almost the same age should get the most basic respect

We said!

I think the unit since the termination of your employment shows that your value does not matter anymore, the cat will climb the tree may be the tiger also know.

Accumulated work data can be handed over and must be handed over; but the work experience based on the work data does not need to be taught. Everyone's understanding of the work is different, your work experience is not mastered by others in a short period of time, and since you have left it, you have no obligation to bring up children for others.

Theoretically, you don't have to give up your skills, because they are all skills that you have, so why give them up?

The importance of technology

Some time ago I saw a segment that was very humorous, but revealed part of the nature of the workplace.

A restaurant wants to recruit senior chefs, and then every senior chef will let him do a dish that he thinks he is best at, and when the chef finishes the dish, the boss of the company suddenly puts up his face and says, "You're not suitable for our business, so please hurry up and leave.

Then the chef was baffled, because when he first came to this enterprise, the boss smiled and said to him, the enterprise is your home, you must perform well, as long as the performance is good, we will certainly hire you. But when he finished the dish, he was benched.

The camera panned out, and when the chef left, the owner of this restaurant suddenly said to the person next to him: brother-in-law, have you familiarized yourself with the process of the dish he just made?

The chef said: already familiar with it, you can rest assured that on the 2nd day I will be able to make the exact same dish as he just did.

The restaurant through this unorthodox tactics to obtain other people's special skills, very much not in line with the workplace ethics, but there is nothing to be done, and in the real workplace, each employee will have their own masterpiece, this part of the masterpiece, there is no one to force you to transfer the technology through to the business. If so, you can also through a number of means to defend their legitimate rights and interests.

The technology is your own, is your own

We first need to understand a little, what is called technology? This technology refers to the technology you learned in this business, you in this business after personal honing their own pinch out of the technology, as well as you did not enter this business before, has mastered the technology a *** divided into these three plates.

If the enterprise to your technology, you simply do not have to hand over to the enterprise, after all, the enterprise to you, it itself is the existence of a teacher, it is handed over to you, it is sure that it will also be, the enterprise will not be stupid to find you directly.

So the enterprise to find you want this part of the technology, to a large extent, you after their own efforts to learn, hard to study the new technology learned, and this part of the technology itself is mastered by you, the company does not have the right to find you want, you do not have to give the enterprise.

Dismissed from the organization, I suggest you don't hand over all of the technology you know! There is no obligation and no need!

Your technology is your personal capital:

Your technology is from your school graduation, into the community, to the post after learning, training (internal or external training), the master to help pass on the belt, observation and thinking, in the post on the groping summary and even their own money to go to the professional upgrading, step by step to master, this is a process from the outside to the inside. The process is also a gradual internalization of the process, which ultimately belongs to your personal wealth, also belongs to your personal experience, is your personal capital!

Besides, there is no law that says you have to hand over all your skills when you leave the company.

Handing over relevant information at the time of termination :

At the time of your termination, you took the initiative to hand over your work-related information, and made a list of your work, and did a good job of handing over your work, and if time permits, you can guide the people who took over some of the basic workflow, which is a manifestation of your good work style, and also a manifestation of your personal character.

Inheritance of the company's technology:

The company's written information, such as technical manuals, operating instructions, these belong to the company's property, is the inheritance of technology from one generation to the next, the inheritance of management, this technology is to stay in the company, the technology you have must be much more than this, in your mind, there is no need to write out all the technology, give it to others.

If you have signed a non-compete agreement, the technology you have is a non-compete, and you have to consider appropriate avoidance after being terminated and choosing a new job.

Encyclopedia explains: non-compete, also known as non-compete avoidance, is related to the content of the specific business of a particular person to prohibit certain behaviors of a system. Non-competition means that according to the law or through the labor contract and confidentiality agreement, the employer prohibits the workers from working part-time in the unit during the period of their employment, or prohibits them from working in the unit after leaving the original unit to compete with the original unit, including the creation of enterprises with the same business scope as the original unit.

In summary, there is no obligation or need to hand over all the skills you know after being dismissed from your organization!

This question involves a question of the scope of the work to be handed over. To clarify the scope, I personally believe that the only criterion is: after the handover, the work can continue to run smoothly. This is a prerequisite for handing over work, and it's the most basic thing you can do.

The content of your handover, there is only one purpose, that is, to ensure that the work continues to run smoothly, with this standard of judgment, in practice, when encountering the handover, it is very easy to know what must be clear handover, which is not in the scope of the handover.

It is important to note that: to ensure that the work continues to run smoothly, and to ensure that the work continues to run smoothly with the original quality, is not the same.

In other words, that is, the work can continue on the line, as for the replacement can do a kind of what, that is his business, strictly speaking, and you have nothing to do.

So, if you don't hand over the technology to the person who replaces you, can the work still be done properly? If you can, I personally think there is no need to hand over, because the technology this thing, and process those handover content is still different, on the one hand, the technology is very personalized things, rely on a short period of time to teach is not taught in place, on the other hand, take over the person who is not in place of the technology, that should reflect on their own problems, rather than waiting for others to teach.

So, it is still the same: the content of the handover must be to ensure that the work continues to run smoothly, in addition to this, I personally do not think in the scope of the handover.

Like myself last month when the handover, or very smooth, I'm not a technical position, is a clerical staff, the handover is relatively easy.

At that time, I did all the handover of the content of the form, in triplicate, I and the other side of a copy of the remaining copies of our two signatures to confirm that I handed over to my direct leadership.

After I left, I also helped my former colleague who replaced me through the adjustment period by phone and microblogging, which took about a month, and now it's basically no problem at all.

So, the attitude of the resignation handover is also a test of a person to figure out the scope of the content of the handover, I suggest that a positive attitude to face the handover, and even in the premise of not delaying their own things, do some "after-sales" work.

The workplace is inevitable around a circle and then together again **** thing, not to make things difficult for others, but also to give themselves a way out.

These days it's better to keep a hand in life, right?