Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Diet recipes - What's your opinion about Sun Yat-sen University associate professor denying that bird's nest is an IQ tax?
What's your opinion about Sun Yat-sen University associate professor denying that bird's nest is an IQ tax?
For a long time, many scientific reports have said that bird's nest is not very effective. The nutritional value of bird's nest is not even as much as that of eating an egg. The so-called main ingredient is mostly protein, so it is not necessary to spend a lot of money to eat it. Moreover, most people think that bird's nest has no effect, just a trend and follow suit. There is no need to pay this IQ tax.

However, as a high-end food in China, bird's nest has been traditionally used as a nourishing food, so it is really ineffective. But people who really insist on eating bird's nest will think that bird's nest is effective, but they should insist on eating it for a long time. The most common effect of bird's nest is the anti-aging effect of yin beauty. But the latest science shows that the real value of bird's nest lies in its sialic acid. This is its most valuable place, and its efficacy is irreplaceable among other ingredients. It is very helpful to human brain and human body, and it can make people smarter, and its role in preventing dementia in the elderly is very obvious. These two advantages are irreplaceable by other ingredients. In addition, bird's nest has the function of resisting virus and preventing germs from invading. So its efficacy is very much. In addition, we know that bird's nest is a tonic rather than a medicine, so we are not too mythical about the role of bird's nest, but we should treat it with a scientific eye.

This time, the associate professor of Sun Yat-sen University can come out to deny that bird's nest is an IQ tax, which is very rational and scientific. Traditional Chinese medicine culture is the essence of tradition for thousands of years, which often contradicts some modern scientific research. We don't deny scientific things, but we should not blindly think that tradition is dross. Including traditional Chinese medicine, a single medicine has no effect, but a pair of medicine can save lives, which is something that science cannot explain. Therefore, we should treat everything rationally and objectively, not subjectively.