I believe that the director didn't plagiarize. After all, in such a bleak environment of the animation industry, there is no need to spend so much energy to plagiarize an unknown work. At the same time, the evidence accusing director jiaozi of plagiarism is not enough to judge that director jiaozi plagiarized the five-dimensional space.

The star of Five-dimensional Memory wrote a document in Weibo accusing director jiaozi of copying five-dimensional space, which reminds me of many plagiarism farce in recent years. Once a play or a movie starts to explode, someone will stand up and accuse the work of plagiarism. But is this really the case? I admit that there were real hammers before, and some works were indeed plagiarized, but we don't know how many so-called plagiarism is to rub the heat under the prevailing "plagiarism wind".

If anything similar is called plagiarism, according to this logic, wouldn't it be that the character has a nose, two eyes, two ears, all of which are symmetrical, and there is hair on the top of his head, and so on, which is considered plagiarism?

Moreover, listen to this tone, people want to "correct the script." Then, if you really plagiarize the script, the 4 billion box office shows that many people have read it, and everyone knows Nezha's script. Then, let the netizens make a decision and it will be over. Moreover, this is still a drama that claims to have been played for three years. Unfortunately, there is no plot. Maybe people ask for secrecy at this time. Furthermore, look at the scene comparison pictures sent here. With a few badly pasted pictures, at best, the color matching is slightly marginal. Therefore, I don't think Director jiaozi copied it.