Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Catering franchise - In the era of fast food reading, should we write flowing water or create high-quality works?
In the era of fast food reading, should we write flowing water or create high-quality works?
The suggestion is to write some running essays first to see how much you have read, and then try to create high-quality works. After all, only when you have tried can you find the one that suits you best.

Advantages and disadvantages of creating mobile prose

superiority

As we all know, everyone's time is precious in this era. Real time is money. Short video platforms such as Tik Tok and Aauto Quicker have an amazing amount of downloads, because it may only take ten seconds to let people know something new and bring new feelings. Similarly, between flowing prose and high-quality works, flowing prose has the advantages of simple creation, short reading time and no strong continuity. A journal article is like a journal. The quality is not as good as a high-quality work, but it can be created and published for a long time to meet the author's time demand.

Disadvantaged

The disadvantages of flowing prose are obvious. First, it is difficult to guarantee the quality of the flowing prose. The quantity may be considerable, but the quality is not satisfactory. Second, many young people have gradually realized the disadvantages of fast food culture. Because of fast-food reading, many articles are short in length, and the emotions and connotations contained in them are also short but not sharp enough. Readers often read it, but the essence inside has not been well felt and excavated. Driven by this situation, running articles may not really get a good reading volume.

Advantages and disadvantages of creating high-quality works

superiority

There is no doubt that high-quality works are far superior to flowing water in quality. Once a high-quality work is discovered, many people will read it carefully. It is believed that many authors want to see a high-quality work that can be read by readers. Quality works will last longer. The existence time here does not refer to its own existence, but to its retention in the reader's impression. Even if a good work takes a long time, readers can't remember many details, but the profound connotation it contains and the emotion it produces when reading will always exist, which is also the best part of writing.

Disadvantaged

The disadvantages are actually obvious. People's energy is limited, creating high-quality works is not as easy as imagined, and it is hard to say that they will get good feedback, so there are still some risks. Moreover, there are still many people who like fragmented reading, so there may be fewer people who actually read long and high-quality works.

In my opinion, you can try flowing prose first, because it is easier to create. Look at the amount of reading, and then try to create high-quality works. Try both, and then compare them, and you may get a satisfactory result.

That's all the answers ~