Positive argument: As for the debate about whether the development of science and technology is beneficial or harmful, friends agree that the advantages of the development of science and technology outweigh the disadvantages.
Compared with 654.38+ million years ago, the way of human existence will not change much. Compared with before 2000, there will not be much change before 3000; Compared with 500 years ago, there will not be much change 600 years ago. However, today's people are not the people they used to be. Even now, compared with 100 years ago, they are completely different. What has promoted the development of human history? What made mankind start a new way of life? I said, this is technology. It is the development of science and technology that promotes the progress of mankind. It is the development of science and technology that gives mankind this brand-new and beautiful life. Throughout the ages, which dynasty and generation did not attach importance to the development of science and technology? Looking back, the four great inventions are unique; Look at the astronomical calendar and marvel; Look at Zhaozhou Arch Bridge, which is beautifully designed; A glimpse of the oriental masterpiece compendium of materia medica: look at the value of pi, seven decimal places; Overlooking the Silk Road and developing the economy; Blue and white porcelain is very famous overseas. Scientific and technological development is the road to a strong country and the first driving force for the progress of the Chinese nation. How can we live a happy life today without science? Without science and technology, how can we have a comfortable material life and spiritual enjoyment? Without the progress of science and technology, how can you eat hybrid 2? How can I put on cotton-padded jacket and live in a tall building?
There is an argument on the other side: how many amazing changes have taken place in the world since mankind entered the 2 1 century. While people are delighted with the rapid development of science and technology, they have also experienced better anxiety and even disasters. In addition to the panic caused by the development of high technology, especially biotechnology, war and disease seem to directly bring mankind to the door of hell. The invasion of various viruses, the exhaust gas behind cars, the exhaust gas from factories and so on. Don't invade our beautiful home. Why are our homes threatened, why are trees cut down in large numbers, and why is the air not fresh? These are all kinds of criminal evidence brought by science and technology. Modern science and technology have brought us some comfort and convenience, but at the same time, they have also brought about a wide range of influences. How can human beings live comfortably without a beautiful environment? If people don't remedy their mistakes quickly, mankind will eventually be destroyed by science and technology.
Moderator: OK, we invite both sides to debate and state their views.
There are two kinds of views: the ancient people were superstitious about ghosts and gods, and believed that human life was decided by heaven, and birth, illness and death were controlled by heaven;
In modern times, people have proved that superstition is not desirable through the development of science and technology, and they should create their own lives through their own hands. In ancient times, many people were seriously ill, and doctors could do nothing but watch patients die painfully. But now, through the development of science and technology, most intractable diseases have been successfully cured, and people don't have to worry about getting sick. ..... The above example is just the tip of the iceberg of the case that scientific and technological development benefits mankind. The rapid development of science and technology is unimaginable to ancient people. Why do TV and newspapers talk about promoting the development of science and technology almost every day, because how is the dream of flying for thousands of years round? It is the development of science and technology; What makes communication convenient? It is the development of science and technology; Why can seriously ill people live a happy life again? It is the development of science and technology! If the development of science and technology is wrong, then why do inventors and scientists such as Galileo, Newton, Edison, Madame Curie and Einstein dedicate their precious lives to science? Why spend so much precious time on the "wrong" cause? Have they no judgment? Who thinks their death is worthless, and who thinks their contribution to science is meaningless?
Opposing point of view: the development of science and technology has brought benefits to our lives, which we do not deny. However, we believe that the disadvantages brought by technology outweigh the benefits. First of all, although cars are convenient for us to travel, the exhaust gas from archways has caused environmental pollution and affected human health. Second, the appearance of entertainment facilities such as television has brought convenience to people, but it has also virtually blocked the communication between people, which is weak. There is also the emergence of the Internet. There is no denying that some lawless elements have the opportunity to disrupt people's lives and wait for a series of side effects brought by your so-called high technology. How can you just sit back and watch?
Moderator: Well, both sides have just stated their views, so we will enter the free debate session. There are 3 minutes on each side, please cherish! There is a tripartite debate.
Three arguments: of course, the development of science and technology has also caused some negative effects, but these effects should have been very small, but human beings are like a magnifying glass, magnifying these negative effects. If humans can consciously reuse plastic bags instead of littering them, will it cause such serious white pollution? If mankind can exploit resources exhaustively, will it cause the current shortage of resources? If humans can save water and factories don't illegally discharge pollutants, will it cause serious water shortage now? There are many such things. Some people not only don't introspect, but blindly point the responsibility at "technology". I feel ridiculous and desperate for these people.
Three arguments are opposite to each other: just now, the other's argument is just a hypothesis. Please come back to reality and ask, if there is no obstruction from science and technology, why should we promote environmental protection now? Besides, the current network problem is exactly what everyone is worried about. Many teenagers who should be happy in the motherland have gone astray and embarked on the road of crime. You said that although the internet can facilitate us to find information, how can such a small advantage be compared with the future of the motherland?
Four arguments: However, the development of science and technology has more benefits. The launch of the rocket has fulfilled the century-old dream of China people, and the completion of the Bird's Nest Water Cube has fulfilled China's Olympic dream. Without technology, how can China people realize their dreams? Why do you want to grasp the problem of network?
Oppose the other side's four arguments: the other side thinks the network problem is very important. Teenagers are the flowers of the motherland, and the future of the motherland depends on teenagers. The internet has made teenagers confused, and how many teenagers can't extricate themselves from it? If the next generation of the motherland is addicted to the internet, how can they realize more dreams of the motherland? Excuse me, another debater.
A positive statement: we are happy, we are lucky, and we have caught up with an era of rapid development of science and technology, an era full of high technology. This is not only because our ancestors chose development and progress in evolution, but also includes the unremitting efforts and hard study of all people. How many hard-working scientists have bought it with their wisdom and even their lives today. Because of Faraday, our life is full of all kinds of electrical appliances; Because of Darwin and Mendel, we can know ourselves better and know ourselves; Because of Bian Que, because of Hua Tuo and because of Li Shizhen, our life can be guaranteed. Didn't they buy everything around us? Life is so comfortable, life is so pleasant and life is so wonderful. Our average life expectancy is 30 years higher than that in ancient times, and we don't even have to go out to visit relatives and friends. Isn't this all the benefits of scientific development?
Contrary: In primitive times, human beings only needed resources on the surface of the earth to survive, and only needed biological resources such as streams, fruits on trees and grass seeds to entertain themselves. Later, tools appeared, and then breeding was carried out, and the resources were utilized to a depth of one foot. Later, coal mines, metals and other resources went down to the seabed of 100 meters, and then down to 5000 meters. When people make use of them, they speed up their quest for resources from the depths of the earth.
Argument: As long as we control science and technology, the earth will not be destroyed.
Moderator: Three minutes. Just now, after fierce competition between the two sides, we should sum up. Now, let's enter the closing meeting. Let me start with four arguments.
Four arguments: Thank you, moderator! Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and high-tech and its industries have promoted the development of the national economy. It can be said that high-tech and its industry have become the locomotive of contemporary scientific and technological development. Science and technology have changed people's ideas, improved people's living standards and promoted the development of socialist civilization. Scientific development can reflect a country's economic development level and national economic literacy. Science and technology are the primary productive forces, the concentrated expression and main symbol of advanced productive forces. I said that to develop productive forces and improve economic benefits, we must first rely on the development of science and technology. From the perspective of productive forces, science and technology can constantly improve and update labor tools, improve the quality of workers and make full use of labor objects. In short, the development of science and technology can greatly liberate productive forces, even create new industrial sectors, and lead to the rapid development of the national economy. We must adhere to the strategy of rejuvenating the country through science and education, so that the economic growth mode can get rid of the extensive old road and turn to the track centered on improving economic efficiency. It is indispensable to pay attention to the quality and benefit of economic development TV in life. We can watch the news and learn about things at home and abroad; You can watch cartoons and relax; You can also not go to the scene to watch programs and performances; For example, when the Olympic mascots are announced, we can watch the broadcast at home. A series of technologies have really brought us benefits, so we insist that the development of science and technology has both advantages and disadvantages!
Four arguments against it: in today's society, science is developing rapidly and many high-tech products are constantly emerging. Computers, cars, dishwashers, washing machines ... have entered the lives of ordinary people. They do bring a lot of convenience to our lives, but at the same time they gradually lose the basic abilities of human beings. With computers, people no longer think with their brains, because they can do it with computers; With cars, people are no longer used to walking, walking, but driving for a ride; With the dishwasher, people no longer wash dishes by hand. Maybe one day, people will forget how to wash dishes. The development of science and technology is mixed. Happily, it provides the greatest convenience for our life. What is worrying is that one day computers will replace the human brain and machines will replace the hands. By then, the world will no longer be dominated by people who think they are smart, but machines invented by human beings! So I think: the development of science and technology will inhibit the all-round development of people!
Another example is airplanes, rockets, networks and satellites, which originally appeared for military wars. The same technology is used as an accomplice to the destruction of mankind while benefiting mankind. So we think that the disadvantages of scientific and technological development outweigh the advantages!
Moderator: The debate is over! Both debaters demonstrated their views on the question "whether the development of science and technology is beneficial or harmful". Let me draw a conclusion. The development of science and technology has indeed provided convenience for mankind, but at the same time, we should also deal with all kinds of problems arising from it to make our earth, the home of mankind, more beautiful. Let's work together.