From the emergence of a large number of robotic arms on Foxconn's assembly line three years ago, to the game between Alpha Dog and Li Shishi, the world's top Go player, to the concept version of "unmanned supermarket" released by Ma Yun a week ago, and to the intelligent programs in mobile phones and cars, artificial intelligence has swept all aspects of our lives with an irresistible trend.
So some people say that people in the workplace face great challenges. In the future, many jobs will be replaced by robots, and many people are in danger of losing their jobs, such as cashiers, shopping guides, speed recorders and so on.
This kind of voice can also be heard in the accounting field, especially after the introduction of artificial intelligence by the four Deloitte, which caused an uproar in this field. Is artificial intelligence coming? Will it really rob many people of their jobs? The answer is yes, many people see the crisis, but Mande enterprise service sees the opportunity.
Artificial intelligence has broken some kind of "class solidification". Take the accounting field as an example. In China, there are more than 20 million financial personnel, 95% of whom are financial accountants and only 5% are management accountants. There is a surplus of low-level talents and a serious shortage of high-level talents. There are many reasons for this situation, but from the perspective of human nature itself, people are lazy, and their financial work is stable and high-paying, which makes some people lose the motivation of self-improvement and makes high-end talents and low-end talents form a natural barrier, belonging to the same field but belonging to two extremes.
The arrival of artificial intelligence broke the solidification of this high and low-end class, and low-end talents had to flow upward to resist the impact of artificial intelligence. For them, artificial intelligence has become an external force for them to break through the solidification of the class.
Artificial intelligence is bound to set off a wave of learning in the whole society The employment competition brought by the development of artificial intelligence is not limited to simple mechanical work, and even affects mental workers such as journalists, editors and accountants, which makes no industry and no job safe and stable. Yuval harari, a famous doctor of history at Oxford University, mentioned a term in A Brief History of the Future: useless class, that is, each of us may lose our jobs because of robots. According to the prediction in the book, after several decades, 99% people will become useless classes, and only 1% people will be spared. This judgment is alarmist, but who can predict what will happen in decades?
When society develops to a certain extent, it is difficult to improve social labor productivity due to objective factors, and social individuals lack horizontal and vertical flow mechanisms. At this time, is it not good for an external factor to break this balance? The development of artificial intelligence will certainly promote the learning wave of the whole society and industry, and everyone will get a lifelong career-learning. Only in this way can we strive for perfection in this field and realize cross-border employment in other fields.
Take the accounting field as an example. This industry is a relatively closed industry. As long as you continue to study and improve your "technical content", you can settle down. The country has long been a * * policy for training management accounting talents, and the martial arts in the world are unbreakable. Those accountants who are one step ahead and ahead of the times will certainly become the trendsetters of the times. Artificial intelligence brings the possibility of shuffling cards to society, eliminating "fill in the blanks" and leaving elites. This is a high-speed train to the future. Only by being the first, being prepared, constantly charging and improving yourself can you buy a limited number of tickets.
This is the best time and the worst time. Some people see danger, others see opportunity. What do you see?