Once again, fighting corruption makes economic and social development healthier rather than the other way around. Economic and social development resources will always be scarce, healthy economic and social development is able to allocate scarce resources to the real promotion of economic and social development in the field. When a society is no longer eating dinner but eat the scene, the party is no longer emotional exchanges but the interests of the collusion of time, the catering industry is naturally the more upscale the more profitable, the more profitable the more expansion. But this is not economic prosperity but pathology, this is not social progress but social sadness. We also cite the previous example: now the anti-corruption let some open restaurants from the catering industry transformation of big data, whether it can be successful is not important, at least for the Chinese society to use the money to improve the level of social informatization to be more valuable than to use to eat and drink on the more valuable. Similar transformation of resource allocation, in the real estate market, in the official car, in the hotel training institutions, etc. have appeared, which is a good signal of China's economic and social development.

The scientific nature of the anti-corruption method to be confident enough

The author thinks that today's China's anti-corruption has a distinctive style of leadership, but this is China's anti-corruption to really start and deep down the magic weapon. As the saying goes, "the law can not be to self", and then the good system if there is no authority of the force and authority of the guarantee is also a piece of paper. Not to mention that in this full of personalized color behind, we have a series of institutional system to follow up.

Imagine if there is no reform of the disciplinary system, so that the disciplinary department relatively free from more specialized cases; if there is no inspection system to further strengthen and improve the inspection team leader once a mandate to be held accountable for the discovery of corruption, how is it possible to have so much of the corruption phenomenon was found and investigated? If there is no series of "eight provisions" as a representative of covering the selection of cadres, performance evaluation, clean governance, style of work and other aspects of the guidelines, rules, regulations, decisions and other institutional construction, anti-corruption and how can the teacher out of the name, targeted, to the point? We have never denied the fundamental significance of the system to fight corruption, but we can not expect to suddenly drop from the sky a set of perfect system for our use. A truly effective system must be in the long-term anti-corruption practice of gradual improvement, endogenous evolution will gradually mature and finalized, we can not excuse the system has not been perfected on the phenomenon of corruption to turn a blind eye to, not as.