Ge, a poet in Song Dynasty, also identified Qu Yuan's works as twenty-six (3) in Yun Zai. The book says: "Han Tui said,' Li Sao' is twenty-five." Wang's Tian Wen is also called Twenty-five Pieces of Flexion. "Songs of the South" contains only twenty-three articles, instead of twenty-five articles and nine arguments. The author of Nine Arguments is Song Yu, not Qu Yuan. Although the purpose of the book "Songs of the South" is an article commenting on Qu Yuan and Song Dynasty, the preface of "Nine Arguments" can only be regarded as written by Song Yu, a disciple of Qu Yuan. Although Zhao Da has doubts about the original text, it is a poor work. If Nine Arguments was written by Song Yu on Qu Yuan's pain, then Evocation should also be written by Qu Yuan, which should be twenty-six. I don't know, what's wrong with Wang Yizhi's words? "Ge according to wang yi's plan is twenty-five, he also agreed that wang yi suspected that" big move "is a poor work, plus an article" evocation ",it should be twenty-six. Liu Yishan's article "A New Quyuan Temple" (IV) says: "Qu Yuan's works include Lisao, Jiuge (XI), Tian Wen, Jiuzhang (IX), Yuanyou, Buju, Fisherman, Evocation and so on. 26. "Wu Guangping said in the article" On the Four Transformations of Qu Yuan to Song Yu "(V):" Qu Yuan's handed down works include Li Sao, Jiu Ge (1 1), Nine Chapters (9), Tian Wen, Yuan You and Bu. These 25 works were indeed written by Qu Yuan. In the past, some scholars suspected that there were forgeries, but the arguments were very fragile. ..... There is another big move ... Personally, I think this song belongs to Qu Yuan. ..... Therefore, there are 26 works of Qu Yuan handed down. "
2. Twenty-five works by Qu Yuan. This theory originated from Ban Gu's Hanshu? He said, easy to bend twenty-five. But there is no specific title. In Song Dynasty, Zhu thought that Qu Yuan's works were twenty-five. He thinks Zhao Da is a masterpiece, and the rest of the articles are the same as Wang Xizhi's. Liang Qichao thinks that there are 25 works of Qu Yuan in the Study of Qu Yuan (VI), and says that 26 works of Wang Yi (including) are wrong, because one of Evocation belongs to Qu Yuan according to Sima Qian's theory, and it is a forgery for later generations. Li Soul is not an article, but a nonsense of all articles in Nine Songs. Cai Jingquan said in the History of Chu Literature (VII): "In the absence of historical data, it is best not to easily doubt the twenty-five articles of the Han people, because the Han people are not too far away from Qu Yuan's era." He believes that Buju and Fisherman are recognized as pseudographs by modern researchers because their contents are obviously descriptions of Qu Yuan by later generations, and their forms are more similar to Fu, and he says that "after excluding these two pseudographs, what should be added is evocation and harmony".
3. Twenty-seven works by Qu Yuan. Lin Yunming, a poet in A Qing, said in "Songs of the South" that there are 27 works by Qu Yuan. On the basis of Wang Yi's Twenty-six Articles (including Zhao Da), he listed Evocation as Qu Yuan's work. Wang Yi's Songs of the South listed evocation as Song Yu's works. Today's Hao Zhida's "Chu Ci Today Annotated and Translated Today" (8) inherits Lin Yunming's statement. Chen Zizhan's "Direct Interpretation of Chu Ci" (IX) also thinks that there are 27 works by Qu Yuan. However, in order to conform to Ban Gu's theory of "Qu Yuan's Twenty-five Poems", he merged eleven of the nine poems into nine, that is, with Mrs. Xiang and Shao Siming, and said: "The last poem" Ritual Soul "can be regarded as the nonsense of the first eight poems, but it is actually a divine comedy of eight poems.
4. Twenty-three works by Qu Yuan. Guo Moruo's Study of Qu Yuan (10) holds that there are 23 works of Qu Yuan. He thinks that Qu Yuan didn't write Farewell, Buju and Fisherman. Both Lu Kanru and You Guoen made it very clear, and I am no different. It is said that Yuan You is the first draft of Sima Xiangru's Adult Fu, while Buju and Fisherman were written by Song Yu and Jing Ke. At the same time, it is believed that Zhao Da was originally written by Qin people, not by Chu people. In addition, evocation is listed as Qu Yuan, and other statements are the same as those of Wang Yi. Nie Shiqiao's On Qu Yuan (1 1), like Guo Moruo's, thinks that Qu Yuan's works are twenty-three. Mao Dun also thinks that Qu Yuan's works are twenty-three in the article Chu Ci and China Myth (12). He said that the evocation in Songs of the South was Qu Yuan's work, Yuan You, Buju and Fisherman were forgeries, and Zhao Da was a forgery of Western Han people.
5. Eleven works by Qu Yuan. Lu Kanru's Biography of Qu Yuan (13) thinks that only eleven works in Chu Ci belong to Qu Yuan. The 1 1 works are Li Sao, Tian Wen, Ode to Orange, Missing, Mourning for the Past, Memories, Beauty, Mourning, Shejiang, Huai Sha and Nostalgia for the Past. However, China Poetry History (14), which he co-authored with Feng, later said: "Only most of Li Sao and Nine Chapters can be counted as Qu Yuan's works." When I say "most of the nine chapters", I mean that only five of the nine chapters were written by Qu Yuan, while four of the nine chapters, such as Xi Yong, Si, Xi Past, and Regret for the Past, are "untitled and nonsense", which is somewhat suspicious. It is said that "Nine Songs" is a folk sacrificial song in all parts of Chu, which was collected around the early Han Dynasty, plus the general name of "Nine Songs". It means "Nine Songs" is a work of Han people. It is believed that Buju and Fisherman must be the records of later generations, but they are mistaken for Qu Yuan's works. At the same time, it is believed that Evocation was written by Song Yu, and Travel Far and Great Movements were written by Han people.
In addition, You Guoen's Qu Yuan (15) said: "Nine Songs was originally written orally by the people, and was later written or revised by Qu Yuan." Xu Duren's Interpretation of Songs of the South (16) said: "Nine Songs is an equal work, and Wang Yi and Zhu said that Nine Songs was written by Qu Yuan." Not exactly. He said that Li Sao was written by Liu An, Huai Sha was written by Jia Yi, and Tian Wen was written by people in the Western Han Dynasty. There are also many controversies about Qu Yuan's works in Nine Chapters. Liu Yongji, Qufu as a mirror? Narration (17) called Ode to Orange and Simian as pseudographs, while Wen Yiduo's Nine Chapters (18) considered Ode to Orange as pseudographs. He Tianxing's Textual Research on Chu Ci (19) and Zhu Dongrun's Qu Fu beyond Lisao (20) basically denied Qu Yuan's copyright. This statement of "total negation" has been refuted by academic circles. Guo Moruo, Xie Wuliang, Liang Qichao, Lu Kanru, You Guoen and other well-known scholars have written articles to refute.
In contemporary academic circles, most people think that eleven articles of Li Sao, Tian Wen, Evocation, Buju, Fisherman and Nine Songs and Nine Chapters were written by Qu Yuan. There are still many controversies about "big move" and "long journey". I think Zhao Da and Yuan You were written by Qu Yuan. These twenty-seven books are all involved, so I won't go into details here.