Most of Shanghai Blow's views focus on the following three points:
1, Shanghai is highly internationalized, that is, westernization. At this point, I think Beijing is the capital of China and the city of China. Of course, it can't be like Shanghai, where Lawson and 7- 1 1 are everywhere, foreign devils are running all over the street, and they are proud to speak English and Japanese. There is a limit to worshipping foreign things and obsessing over foreigners, and you can't just talk to foreigners. Find a foreign uncle and you will shine at the moment. I don't know what it means to lose power and humiliate the country. I don't know what it means to humiliate my country and my family. Beijing has also been occupied by foreigners and Japanese, but Beijingers have no shameless servility and colonial color like Shanghai. Based on this, Beijing is good! )
The economy around Shanghai is very good, and Beijing is surrounded by poor rural areas. So Shanghai has promoted the prosperity of the surrounding areas, and Beijing has sucked up the surrounding resources. At this point, my view is that Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces have always been rich areas in China. It is better to consider whether your Shanghai has driven the surrounding economy or whether the surrounding economy has already driven your Shanghai. Beijing has been poor since ancient times because of many wars, but can't it be said that the development of Tianjin is driven by Beijing? So don't be partial. There is no denying that Beijing is indeed absorbing resources, especially the national elite, but isn't your development in Shanghai also dependent on absorbing resources? In the 1980s, a large part of state finance was used to build Shanghai. If not absorbing resources, what is it? Have you forgotten Pudong New Area, Shanghai Stock Exchange, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech and Lujiazui? )
In urban construction, there are more high-rise buildings than Beijing. This kind of thing is a matter of opinion There are many cultural relics and historic sites in Beijing, the building height is limited, and there are few people and many places. There is really no need to build so many tall buildings. If this kind of thing is compared, it really can't compare with Shanghai. When rural people enter the city for the first time, they may think that many high-rise buildings represent the prosperity of a city. I am different from this kind of people. High-rise buildings can only represent the densely populated and sparsely populated cities. It is not that this high-rise building technology is unique to Shanghai, and other cities do not build so high, just because of the low population density, which has nothing to do with prosperity. The area of Beijing is nearly three times that of Shanghai, and the population is 3 million less than that of Shanghai. Laugh at the low buildings in Beijing. Are you afraid that Beijingers will laugh to death at your villagers? )