This is a typical muddy answer on the first floor! ! The questioner says he doesn't know, but you think he lied on purpose. This is a typical subjective assumption, confusing! ! !

Let me answer the following question: 1. If you really don't drink alcohol but eat food containing alcohol or other foods that are not clearly marked with alcohol, then it is reasonable to say that you are not at fault, but because drunk driving is based on results, you will be punished accordingly in law; 2. If this situation does exist, it can only show that there are flaws in the determination of responsibility for drunk driving, and some extremely special circumstances have not been taken into account. For example, a person who retaliated against the society stopped the car when the driver stopped, opened the door and quickly injected the driver with unknown liquid and fled. The driver panicked and drove directly to the hospital, but Lu Yu checked the drunk driving and found out that it was drunk driving+drunk driving. Do not trace the source, directly deal with drivers according to drunk driving, and do not slip the world record; In fact, if the probability of this kind of event is very small, even very small, then I think it is better to pay more attention to myself. If you encounter it, you can only admit that you are unlucky, because to be honest, if you start this retrospective method, then the corresponding nepotism and corruption will definitely follow.