Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Complete cookbook - In addition to cfop, are there any more advanced ways to play the Rubik's Cube?
In addition to cfop, are there any more advanced ways to play the Rubik's Cube?

Look at your question - -

Is cfop advanced? - cfop is just a relatively mature gameplay, and cfop only gives you standard formulas

Including the four-way formula, there are probably about 600 formulas. In short, it is a gameplay based on formulas.

There are also non-standard ones.

From this perspective, this method is really not advanced.

In addition, the reason why it is said to be mature is that relatively speaking, only three sides of the FRU need to be rotated, so it is relatively smooth and fast. But the high number of rotations is a flaw.

There are unconventional methods like CFA that rely on formulas, which cannot be learned by humans.

Talk about the low self-respect of the bridge pose. The bridge type is less developed now. Compared with CFOP, the advantage of the bridge type is that it has fewer rotations, flexible reduction methods, and relatively few formulas. This is a big advantage.

And the probability of jumping in the bridge pose is very high. 6e4c often skips steps in a daze.

The disadvantage of the bridge pose is that the formula is not easy to use.

But there are also world-class masters in the bridge pose, don’t underestimate the bridge pose

Personally, the most advanced one is the minimal step reduction method used by robots, using ultra-low hand speed (and mechanical manufacturing Is it related to the principle? ) can reach a level of about 10 seconds, which is really beyond the reach of humans.

I don’t know why you are so blindly pursuing advanced gameplay. There is no distinction between high and low in martial arts. I have seen sub25 first. Seven steps ahead! What a brutal hand speed! (Just go to a Rubik’s Cube bar and ask.)

What should I do if observation doesn’t work? Prescribe the right medicine to the situation, use the layer that requires least observation first, and practice hand speed to the limit, which is also very good...

If you have very sharp observation and strong memory, but have limited hand speed, there is no doubt that you should use the bridge pose. The bridge style of free observation saves hand speed + easy jump step has always been the favorite of slow hand flow.

If you are an ordinary person, you should first learn CFOP as a foundation. In contrast, due to the mature formula system, it is most suitable for lazy people and people who are not sharp enough to observe but are not incapable of observation.

Currently SUB30, I am also trying various methods. Some of the ideas of CFOP can be used for reference in the Bridge Pose, especially the seven corner turning formulas of OLL21-27, which are very similar to the 4Cs in the Bridge Pose. I have taken a few of them. The only pain point is that the bridge type 4C requires restoring the position and direction at one time, while CFOP separates these two parts, so it cannot be used directly.